PRAA vs. GLDD

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA) and Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD).

Performance

PRAA vs. GLDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA) and Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PRAA vs. GLDD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PRAA PRA Group, Inc.	-1.07%	-15.32%	-20.27%	-22.44%	-32.72%	26.60%	9.26%	48.95%	-26.60%	-15.09%
GLDD Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation	29.57%	16.21%	47.01%	29.08%	-62.15%	19.36%	16.24%	71.15%	22.59%	28.57%

Fundamentals

Market Cap PRAA : $685.53M GLDD : $1.15B
EPS PRAA : -$7.77 GLDD : $1.09
PS Ratio PRAA : 0.57 GLDD : 1.29
PB Ratio PRAA : 0.70 GLDD : 2.23
Total Revenue (TTM) PRAA : $1.20B GLDD : $888.28M
Gross Profit (TTM) PRAA : $905.17M GLDD : $203.49M
EBITDA (TTM) PRAA : -$225.12M GLDD : $125.52M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRAA achieves a -1.07% return, which is significantly lower than GLDD's 29.57% return. Over the past 10 years, PRAA has underperformed GLDD with an annualized return of -4.90%, while GLDD has yielded a comparatively higher 14.90% annualized return.

PRAA

• 1D: 1.51%
• 1M: 11.11%
• YTD: -1.07%
• 6M: 13.34%
• 1Y: -15.13%
• 3Y*: -23.42%
• 5Y*: -14.22%
• 10Y*: -4.90%

GLDD

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 29.57%
• 6M: 41.78%
• 1Y: 95.40%
• 3Y*: 46.29%
• 5Y*: 2.53%
• 10Y*: 14.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PRAA vs. GLDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRAA

PRAA Risk / Return Rank: 33
PRAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
PRAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
PRAA Omega Ratio Rank: 33
PRAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
PRAA Martin Ratio Rank: 34

GLDD

GLDD Risk / Return Rank: 95
GLDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
GLDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
GLDD Omega Ratio Rank: 93
GLDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
GLDD Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRAA vs. GLDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA) and Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PRAA	GLDD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.23	2.61	-2.84
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.12	3.73	-3.61
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.45	-0.44
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.28	6.26	-6.54
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.50	18.29	-18.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PRAA vs. GLDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRAA Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the GLDD Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRAA and GLDD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PRAA	GLDD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.23	2.61	-2.84
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.29	0.06	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.11	0.35	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.12	0.12	0.00

Correlation

The correlation between PRAA and GLDD is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PRAA vs. GLDD - Dividend Comparison

Neither PRAA nor GLDD has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

PRAA vs. GLDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRAA drawdown since its inception was -83.83%, roughly equal to the maximum GLDD drawdown of -80.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRAA and GLDD.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRAA	GLDD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.83%	-80.76%	-3.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.55%	-14.74%	-37.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-79.35%	-70.32%	-9.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-79.35%	-70.32%	-9.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-72.85%	0.00%	-72.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.96%	-33.17%	+1.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.62%	5.05%	+24.57%

Volatility

PRAA vs. GLDD - Volatility Comparison

PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA) has a higher volatility of 16.04% compared to Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD) at 0.61%. This indicates that PRAA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRAA	GLDD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.04%	0.61%	+15.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.24%	25.37%	+21.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	65.48%	36.78%	+28.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	48.55%	41.75%	+6.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.70%	43.08%	+3.62%

Financials