PortfoliosLab logo
PR vs. WMS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between PR and WMS is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

PR vs. WMS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Permian Resources Corporation (PR) and Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. (WMS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PR:

-0.30

WMS:

-0.76

Sortino Ratio

PR:

-0.23

WMS:

-0.97

Omega Ratio

PR:

0.97

WMS:

0.88

Calmar Ratio

PR:

-0.40

WMS:

-0.65

Martin Ratio

PR:

-1.06

WMS:

-1.13

Ulcer Index

PR:

14.87%

WMS:

26.28%

Daily Std Dev

PR:

43.83%

WMS:

38.97%

Max Drawdown

PR:

-39.91%

WMS:

-53.67%

Current Drawdown

PR:

-21.64%

WMS:

-32.01%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PR:

$10.84B

WMS:

$9.12B

EPS

PR:

$1.64

WMS:

$5.98

PE Ratio

PR:

8.26

WMS:

19.66

PEG Ratio

PR:

0.62

WMS:

1.05

PS Ratio

PR:

2.11

WMS:

3.14

PB Ratio

PR:

1.03

WMS:

5.90

Total Revenue (TTM)

PR:

$5.13B

WMS:

$2.29B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PR:

$2.31B

WMS:

$856.09M

EBITDA (TTM)

PR:

$3.49B

WMS:

$686.17M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PR achieves a -5.00% return, which is significantly lower than WMS's 5.42% return.


PR

YTD

-5.00%

1M

17.48%

6M

-7.70%

1Y

-12.98%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

WMS

YTD

5.42%

1M

17.60%

6M

-7.27%

1Y

-29.33%

5Y*

25.86%

10Y*

15.29%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PR vs. WMS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PR is 2828
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PR is 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PR is 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PR is 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PR is 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PR is 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

WMS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WMS is 1414
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WMS is 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WMS is 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WMS is 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WMS is 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WMS is 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PR vs. WMS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Permian Resources Corporation (PR) and Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. (WMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PR Sharpe Ratio is -0.30, which is higher than the WMS Sharpe Ratio of -0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PR and WMS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

PR vs. WMS - Dividend Comparison

PR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.26%, more than WMS's 0.53% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PR
Permian Resources Corporation
5.26%4.94%2.72%0.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WMS
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
0.53%0.54%0.38%0.57%0.31%0.43%3.48%1.28%1.13%1.12%0.79%0.17%

Drawdowns

PR vs. WMS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PR drawdown since its inception was -39.91%, smaller than the maximum WMS drawdown of -53.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PR and WMS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

PR vs. WMS - Volatility Comparison

Permian Resources Corporation (PR) has a higher volatility of 13.48% compared to Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. (WMS) at 11.48%. This indicates that PR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

PR vs. WMS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Permian Resources Corporation and Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20212022202320242025
1.38B
690.54M
(PR) Total Revenue
(WMS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PR vs. WMS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Permian Resources Corporation and Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-60.0%-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20212022202320242025
49.1%
35.0%
(PR) Gross Margin
(WMS) Gross Margin
PR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Permian Resources Corporation reported a gross profit of 675.97M and revenue of 1.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.1%.

WMS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 241.59M and revenue of 690.54M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.0%.

PR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Permian Resources Corporation reported an operating income of 504.46M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.7%.

WMS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 126.86M and revenue of 690.54M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.4%.

PR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Permian Resources Corporation reported a net income of 329.30M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in a net margin of 23.9%.

WMS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 81.23M and revenue of 690.54M, resulting in a net margin of 11.8%.