PR vs. WMS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Permian Resources Corporation (PR) and Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. (WMS).

Performance

PR vs. WMS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Permian Resources Corporation (PR) and Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. (WMS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PR vs. WMS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
PR Permian Resources Corporation	53.24%	1.89%	11.66%	49.42%	23.93%
WMS Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.	-5.22%	25.97%	-17.48%	72.44%	-38.29%

Fundamentals

Market Cap PR : $16.23B WMS : $10.74B
EPS PR : $1.26 WMS : $6.02
PE Ratio PR : 16.93 WMS : 22.80
PEG Ratio PR : 0.28 WMS : 0.84
PS Ratio PR : 4.06 WMS : 3.59
PB Ratio PR : 1.58 WMS : 137.28
Total Revenue (TTM) PR : $3.90B WMS : $2.99B
Gross Profit (TTM) PR : $1.57B WMS : $1.16B
EBITDA (TTM) PR : $3.45B WMS : $741.90M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PR achieves a 53.24% return, which is significantly higher than WMS's -5.22% return.

PR

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: 17.54%
• YTD: 53.24%
• 6M: 69.78%
• 1Y: 60.32%
• 3Y*: 32.42%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WMS

• 1D: 4.31%
• 1M: -19.88%
• YTD: -5.22%
• 6M: -0.91%
• 1Y: 26.86%
• 3Y*: 18.21%
• 5Y*: 5.38%
• 10Y*: 21.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PR vs. WMS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PR

PR Risk / Return Rank: 80
PR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
PR Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
PR Omega Ratio Rank: 78
PR Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
PR Martin Ratio Rank: 83

WMS

WMS Risk / Return Rank: 66
WMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
WMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
WMS Omega Ratio Rank: 60
WMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
WMS Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PR vs. WMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Permian Resources Corporation (PR) and Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. (WMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PR	WMS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	0.65	+0.76
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	1.33	+0.58
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.15	+0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.28	1.10	+1.19
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.84	3.69	+3.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PR vs. WMS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PR Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is higher than the WMS Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PR and WMS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PR	WMS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.41	0.65	+0.76
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.13	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.52	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.92	0.52	+0.40

Correlation

The correlation between PR and WMS is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PR vs. WMS - Dividend Comparison

PR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, more than WMS's 0.53% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PR Permian Resources Corporation	2.86%	4.28%	5.91%	2.72%	0.53%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WMS Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.	0.53%	0.48%	0.54%	0.38%	0.57%	0.31%	0.43%	3.48%	1.28%	1.13%	1.12%	0.79%

Drawdowns

PR vs. WMS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PR drawdown since its inception was -39.39%, smaller than the maximum WMS drawdown of -53.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PR and WMS.

Drawdown Indicators

	PR	WMS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.39%	-53.58%	+14.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.94%	-24.96%	-1.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-50.12%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-53.58%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.52%	-22.75%	+21.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.76%	-17.87%	+5.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.99%	7.41%	+1.58%

Volatility

PR vs. WMS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Permian Resources Corporation (PR) is 7.68%, while Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. (WMS) has a volatility of 13.66%. This indicates that PR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WMS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PR	WMS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.68%	13.66%	-5.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.08%	23.91%	-1.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.98%	41.31%	+1.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.48%	41.87%	+0.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.48%	41.47%	+1.01%

Financials