PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PR vs. UEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PR vs. UEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Permian Resources Corporation (PR) and Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PR achieves a 45.04% return, which is significantly higher than UEC's 20.63% return.


PR

1D
2.33%
1M
-10.39%
YTD
45.04%
6M
39.55%
1Y
58.02%
3Y*
32.35%
5Y*
10Y*

UEC

1D
-8.74%
1M
-4.93%
YTD
20.63%
6M
8.80%
1Y
121.54%
3Y*
66.37%
5Y*
33.60%
10Y*
31.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PR vs. UEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
PR
Permian Resources Corporation
45.04%1.89%11.66%49.42%23.93%
UEC
Uranium Energy Corp.
20.63%74.59%4.53%64.95%-8.06%

Correlation

The correlation between PR and UEC is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2022

0.24

The correlation between PR and UEC shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PR:

$16.71B

UEC:

$6.82B

EPS

PR:

$0.85

UEC:

-$0.18

PS Ratio

PR:

4.18

UEC:

324.99

PB Ratio

PR:

1.47

UEC:

4.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

PR:

$3.69B

UEC:

$20.20M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PR:

$1.20B

UEC:

$5.72M

EBITDA (TTM)

PR:

$3.15B

UEC:

-$104.07M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PR vs. UEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PR
PR Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
PR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
PR Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
PR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
PR Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

UEC
UEC Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
UEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEC Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
UEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEC Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PR vs. UEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Permian Resources Corporation (PR) and Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRUECDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.76

1.62

+0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.31

2.26

+0.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.26

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

2.99

+0.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.81

5.98

+1.83

PR vs. UEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PR Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the UEC Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PR and UEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRUECDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

1.62

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.05

+0.78

Drawdowns

PR vs. UEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PR drawdown since its inception was -39.39%, smaller than the maximum UEC drawdown of -97.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PR and UEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRUECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.39%

-97.40%

+58.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.26%

-40.86%

+23.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.39%

-53.49%

+14.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.39%

-30.04%

+19.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.50%

-62.12%

+49.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.46%

20.41%

-12.95%

Volatility

PR vs. UEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Permian Resources Corporation (PR) is 10.83%, while Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC) has a volatility of 27.23%. This indicates that PR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRUECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.83%

27.23%

-16.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.50%

57.08%

-33.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.40%

76.21%

-42.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.21%

74.08%

-31.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.21%

73.87%

-31.66%

Dividends

PR vs. UEC - Dividend Comparison

PR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, while UEC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
PR
Permian Resources Corporation
3.02%4.28%5.91%2.72%0.53%
UEC
Uranium Energy Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PR vs. UEC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Permian Resources Corporation and Uranium Energy Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B202220232024202520260
20.20M
(PR) Total Revenue
(UEC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PR and UEC have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UEC has higher volatility (27.23%) compared to PR (10.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PR dropped -39.39% vs UEC's -97.40%.

PR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PR and UEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer