PPL.TO vs. FTS.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PPL.TO) and Fortis Inc. (FTS.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PPL.TO or FTS.TO.
Key characteristics
| PPL.TO | FTS.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 26.13% | 16.77% |
| 1Y Return | 39.74% | 14.10% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 18.23% | 6.53% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 9.04% | 6.13% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 6.77% | 10.09% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.37 | 0.95 |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.57% | 14.59% |
| Max Drawdown | -68.76% | -41.48% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.22% | -0.53% |
Fundamentals
| PPL.TO | FTS.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | CA$32.08B | CA$30.53B |
| EPS | CA$3.26 | CA$3.19 |
| PE Ratio | 16.96 | 19.33 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.37 | 2.95 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | CA$8.18B | CA$11.39B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | CA$2.84B | CA$5.55B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | CA$3.15B | CA$5.14B |
Correlation
The correlation between PPL.TO and FTS.TO is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
PPL.TO vs. FTS.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, PPL.TO achieves a 26.13% return, which is significantly higher than FTS.TO's 16.77% return. Over the past 10 years, PPL.TO has underperformed FTS.TO with an annualized return of 6.77%, while FTS.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.09% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PPL.TO vs. FTS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PPL.TO) and Fortis Inc. (FTS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PPL.TO vs. FTS.TO - Dividend Comparison
PPL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, more than FTS.TO's 3.83% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPL.TO Pembina Pipeline Corporation | 4.91% | 5.82% | 5.55% | 6.57% | 8.37% | 4.90% | 5.53% | 4.48% | 4.52% | 5.97% | 4.06% | 4.40% |
FTS.TO Fortis Inc. | 3.83% | 4.19% | 4.01% | 3.36% | 3.73% | 3.39% | 3.79% | 3.52% | 3.68% | 3.73% | 3.29% | 4.07% |
Drawdowns
PPL.TO vs. FTS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPL.TO drawdown since its inception was -68.76%, which is greater than FTS.TO's maximum drawdown of -41.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPL.TO and FTS.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PPL.TO vs. FTS.TO - Volatility Comparison
Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PPL.TO) and Fortis Inc. (FTS.TO) have volatilities of 3.38% and 3.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
PPL.TO vs. FTS.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pembina Pipeline Corporation and Fortis Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities