PortfoliosLab logo
PPH vs. VIRS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between PPH and VIRS is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

PPH vs. VIRS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) and Pacer BioThreat Strategy ETF (VIRS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


PPH

YTD

2.57%

1M

-1.64%

6M

-1.36%

1Y

0.57%

3Y*

5.53%

5Y*

8.78%

10Y*

3.85%

VIRS

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF

Pacer BioThreat Strategy ETF

PPH vs. VIRS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PPH has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than VIRS's 0.70% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PPH vs. VIRS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PPH is 1717
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PPH is 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PPH is 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PPH is 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PPH is 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PPH is 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

VIRS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VIRS is 8080
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VIRS is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VIRS is 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VIRS is 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VIRS is 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VIRS is 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PPH vs. VIRS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) and Pacer BioThreat Strategy ETF (VIRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

PPH vs. VIRS - Dividend Comparison

PPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, while VIRS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PPH
VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF
1.93%1.98%2.09%1.55%1.62%1.66%1.77%1.97%1.92%2.43%1.93%1.71%
VIRS
Pacer BioThreat Strategy ETF
0.44%0.63%0.97%0.00%0.67%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PPH vs. VIRS - Drawdown Comparison


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

PPH vs. VIRS - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...