PPH vs. VDC
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC).
PPH and VDC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PPH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Pharmaceutical 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011. VDC is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004. Both PPH and VDC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PPH or VDC.
Performance
PPH vs. VDC - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPH achieves a 10.42% return, which is significantly lower than VDC's 17.40% return. Over the past 10 years, PPH has underperformed VDC with an annualized return of 5.06%, while VDC has yielded a comparatively higher 8.60% annualized return.
PPH
10.42%
-4.99%
-0.62%
15.54%
9.59%
5.06%
VDC
17.40%
1.77%
8.46%
21.96%
9.86%
8.60%
Key characteristics
| PPH | VDC | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.43 | 2.22 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.03 | 3.21 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.25 | 1.38 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.24 | 2.80 |
| Martin Ratio | 4.43 | 14.32 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.51% | 1.53% |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.83% | 9.90% |
| Max Drawdown | -46.49% | -34.24% |
| Current Drawdown | -10.53% | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PPH vs. VDC - Expense Ratio Comparison
PPH has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than VDC's 0.10% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between PPH and VDC is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PPH vs. VDC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PPH vs. VDC - Dividend Comparison
PPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, less than VDC's 2.50% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPH VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF | 1.81% | 2.09% | 1.55% | 1.62% | 1.66% | 1.77% | 1.97% | 1.92% | 2.43% | 1.93% | 1.71% | 2.03% |
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF | 2.50% | 2.65% | 2.37% | 2.14% | 2.50% | 2.44% | 2.78% | 2.52% | 2.39% | 2.55% | 1.93% | 2.21% |
Drawdowns
PPH vs. VDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPH drawdown since its inception was -46.49%, which is greater than VDC's maximum drawdown of -34.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPH and VDC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PPH vs. VDC - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) has a higher volatility of 4.11% compared to Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) at 3.13%. This indicates that PPH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.