PPC vs. WSM

In the year-to-date period, PPC achieves a 86.95% return, which is significantly higher than WSM's 73.26% return. Over the past 10 years, PPC has underperformed WSM with an annualized return of 8.07%, while WSM has yielded a comparatively higher 19.49% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current PPC Sharpe Ratio is 3.67, which is higher than the WSM Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPC and WSM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

PPC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%.

The maximum PPC drawdown since its inception was -99.64%, which is greater than WSM's maximum drawdown of -89.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPC and WSM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) is 9.67%, while Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) has a volatility of 25.87%. This indicates that PPC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pilgrim's Pride Corporation and Williams-Sonoma, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.