PPC vs. WSM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM).

Performance

PPC vs. WSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PPC vs. WSM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PPC Pilgrim's Pride Corporation	-3.15%	1.40%	64.10%	16.56%	-15.85%	43.80%	-40.07%	110.96%	-50.06%	63.56%
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc.	2.42%	-2.09%	86.56%	80.24%	-30.49%	68.60%	42.38%	50.07%	0.61%	10.20%

Fundamentals

Market Cap PPC : $9.01B WSM : $22.06B
EPS PPC : $4.54 WSM : $8.84
PE Ratio PPC : 8.32 WSM : 20.63
PEG Ratio PPC : 0.01 WSM : 4.17
PS Ratio PPC : 0.49 WSM : 2.88
PB Ratio PPC : 2.45 WSM : 10.59
Total Revenue (TTM) PPC : $18.50B WSM : $7.81B
Gross Profit (TTM) PPC : $2.36B WSM : $3.60B
EBITDA (TTM) PPC : $1.99B WSM : $1.55B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPC achieves a -3.15% return, which is significantly lower than WSM's 2.42% return. Over the past 10 years, PPC has underperformed WSM with an annualized return of 6.66%, while WSM has yielded a comparatively higher 23.78% annualized return.

PPC

• 1D: 0.85%
• 1M: -12.51%
• YTD: -3.15%
• 6M: -7.27%
• 1Y: -18.23%
• 3Y*: 24.35%
• 5Y*: 12.79%
• 10Y*: 6.66%

WSM

• 1D: 3.10%
• 1M: -11.34%
• YTD: 2.42%
• 6M: -6.09%
• 1Y: 17.11%
• 3Y*: 46.82%
• 5Y*: 17.09%
• 10Y*: 23.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PPC vs. WSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPC

PPC Risk / Return Rank: 21
PPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
PPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
PPC Omega Ratio Rank: 17
PPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
PPC Martin Ratio Rank: 29

WSM

WSM Risk / Return Rank: 57
WSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
WSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
WSM Omega Ratio Rank: 53
WSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
WSM Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PPC vs. WSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PPC	WSM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.61	0.42	-1.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.66	0.87	-1.53
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	1.11	-0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.50	0.80	-1.30
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.82	1.81	-2.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PPC vs. WSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPC Sharpe Ratio is -0.61, which is lower than the WSM Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPC and WSM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PPC	WSM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.61	0.42	-1.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42	0.38	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.20	0.54	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.12	0.33	-0.21

Correlation

The correlation between PPC and WSM is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PPC vs. WSM - Dividend Comparison

PPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.25%, more than WSM's 1.45% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PPC Pilgrim's Pride Corporation	22.25%	21.54%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	14.48%	26.12%
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc.	1.45%	1.43%	1.16%	1.72%	2.65%	1.43%	1.93%	2.55%	3.33%	2.98%	3.02%	2.36%

Drawdowns

PPC vs. WSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPC drawdown since its inception was -99.63%, which is greater than WSM's maximum drawdown of -89.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPC and WSM.

Drawdown Indicators

	PPC	WSM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.63%	-89.01%	-10.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.98%	-20.56%	-12.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.74%	-51.92%	+11.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-62.00%	-59.71%	-2.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.64%	-17.37%	-10.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.76%	-25.10%	-13.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.09%	9.07%	+11.02%

Volatility

PPC vs. WSM - Volatility Comparison

Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) have volatilities of 8.16% and 8.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PPC	WSM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.16%	8.53%	-0.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.16%	23.90%	-4.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.07%	40.81%	-10.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.66%	44.73%	-14.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.26%	44.20%	-10.94%

Financials

PPC vs. WSM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Pilgrim's Pride Corporation and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

PPC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation reported a gross profit of 428.59M and revenue of 4.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.5%.

WSM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.10B and revenue of 2.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.9%.

PPC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation reported an operating income of 204.11M and revenue of 4.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.

WSM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported an operating income of 477.81M and revenue of 2.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.3%.

PPC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation reported a net income of 87.99M and revenue of 4.52B, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.

WSM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a net income of 368.02M and revenue of 2.36B, resulting in a net margin of 15.6%.