PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PP vs. TMFC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between PP and TMFC is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

PP vs. TMFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Meet Kevin Pricing Power ETF (PP) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-7.22%
14.01%
PP
TMFC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PP:

-0.07

TMFC:

1.86

Sortino Ratio

PP:

0.05

TMFC:

2.50

Omega Ratio

PP:

1.01

TMFC:

1.34

Calmar Ratio

PP:

-0.06

TMFC:

2.67

Martin Ratio

PP:

-0.12

TMFC:

10.69

Ulcer Index

PP:

11.21%

TMFC:

2.82%

Daily Std Dev

PP:

20.20%

TMFC:

16.17%

Max Drawdown

PP:

-29.33%

TMFC:

-33.06%

Current Drawdown

PP:

-16.15%

TMFC:

-0.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PP achieves a 4.40% return, which is significantly higher than TMFC's 2.89% return.


PP

YTD

4.40%

1M

1.26%

6M

-7.22%

1Y

2.30%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

TMFC

YTD

2.89%

1M

1.44%

6M

14.01%

1Y

31.29%

5Y*

18.42%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PP vs. TMFC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PP has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than TMFC's 0.50% expense ratio.


PP
The Meet Kevin Pricing Power ETF
Expense ratio chart for PP: current value at 0.76% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.76%
Expense ratio chart for TMFC: current value at 0.50% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.50%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PP vs. TMFC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PP is 66
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PP is 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PP is 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PP is 66
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PP is 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PP is 77
Martin Ratio Rank

TMFC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TMFC is 7777
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TMFC is 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TMFC is 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TMFC is 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TMFC is 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TMFC is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PP vs. TMFC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Meet Kevin Pricing Power ETF (PP) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PP, currently valued at -0.07, compared to the broader market0.002.004.00-0.071.86
The chart of Sortino ratio for PP, currently valued at 0.05, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.052.50
The chart of Omega ratio for PP, currently valued at 1.01, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.011.34
The chart of Calmar ratio for PP, currently valued at -0.06, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00-0.062.67
The chart of Martin ratio for PP, currently valued at -0.12, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00-0.1210.69
PP
TMFC

The current PP Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is lower than the TMFC Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PP and TMFC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.07
1.86
PP
TMFC

Dividends

PP vs. TMFC - Dividend Comparison

PP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, more than TMFC's 0.39% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
PP
The Meet Kevin Pricing Power ETF
0.73%0.77%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TMFC
Motley Fool 100 Index ETF
0.39%0.40%0.26%0.27%0.23%0.42%0.50%0.62%

Drawdowns

PP vs. TMFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PP drawdown since its inception was -29.33%, smaller than the maximum TMFC drawdown of -33.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PP and TMFC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-16.15%
-0.80%
PP
TMFC

Volatility

PP vs. TMFC - Volatility Comparison

The Meet Kevin Pricing Power ETF (PP) has a higher volatility of 5.02% compared to Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) at 4.23%. This indicates that PP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
5.02%
4.23%
PP
TMFC
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab