POWL vs. EMCR
POWL (Powell Industries, Inc.) is a stock, while EMCR (Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF) is Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Solactive ISS Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction & Climate Improvers Index - Benchmark TR Net. Over the past 5 years, POWL returned 88.07%/yr vs 8.04%/yr for EMCR. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
POWL vs. EMCR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POWL achieves a 96.55% return, which is significantly higher than EMCR's 14.41% return.
POWL
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -15.28%
- 6M
- 41.25%
- YTD
- 96.55%
- 1Y
- 175.74%
- 3Y*
- 118.26%
- 5Y*
- 88.07%
- 10Y*
- 36.55%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.00%
EMCR
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -2.20%
- 6M
- 6.42%
- YTD
- 14.41%
- 1Y
- 31.50%
- 3Y*
- 18.44%
- 5Y*
- 8.04%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.51%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $92.23K | $131.48K | $133.87K | |
| $157.02M | $179.88M | $207.23M |
POWL vs. EMCR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POWL Powell Industries, Inc. | 96.55% | 44.49% | 152.21% | 155.62% | 24.34% | 3.60% | -37.60% | 101.58% | -11.25% |
EMCR Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF | 14.41% | 33.25% | 9.69% | 10.55% | -18.73% | 5.54% | 13.49% | 22.41% | -2.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between POWL and EMCR is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2018 | 0.37 |
The correlation between POWL and EMCR shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (5 years) to 0.56 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POWL vs. EMCR — Risk / Return Rank
POWL
EMCR
POWL vs. EMCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL) and Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| POWL | EMCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.25 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.94 | 2.20 | +1.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.78 | 6.82 | +5.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
POWL vs. EMCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POWL drawdown since its inception was -73.10%, which is greater than EMCR's maximum drawdown of -34.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POWL and EMCR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| POWL | EMCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.10% | -34.28% | -38.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.10% | -13.84% | -28.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.76% | -18.38% | -37.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.76% | -34.28% | -21.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.18% | -8.68% | -26.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.04% | -9.26% | -26.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.95% | 4.46% | +8.49% |
Volatility
POWL vs. EMCR - Volatility Comparison
Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL) has a higher volatility of 23.22% compared to Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR) at 8.48%. This indicates that POWL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| POWL | EMCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.22% | 8.48% | +14.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.35% | 21.25% | +29.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.59% | 23.47% | +40.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.40% | 20.12% | +45.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.45% | 20.27% | +35.18% |
Dividends
POWL vs. EMCR - Dividend Comparison
POWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than EMCR's 1.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMCR Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF | 1.53% | 2.43% | 6.62% | 1.95% | 3.05% | 1.83% | 1.75% | 3.15% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
POWL Powell Industries, Inc. | 0.17% | 0.34% | 0.48% | 1.19% | 2.96% | 3.53% | 3.53% | 2.12% | 4.16% | 3.63% | 2.67% | 4.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
POWL and EMCR have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
POWL has higher volatility (23.22%) compared to EMCR (8.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POWL dropped -73.10% vs EMCR's -34.28%.
POWL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for POWL and EMCR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer