POW.TO vs. FM.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Power Corporation of Canada (POW.TO) and First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (FM.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: POW.TO or FM.TO.
Key characteristics
| POW.TO | FM.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 5.35% | 79.08% |
| 1Y Return | 17.10% | -38.51% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 6.80% | -13.73% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 13.85% | 10.70% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 8.53% | -1.33% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.05 | -0.62 |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.02% | 65.47% |
| Max Drawdown | -62.40% | -90.98% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.65% | -56.35% |
Fundamentals
| POW.TO | FM.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | CA$26.13B | CA$15.20B |
| EPS | CA$4.10 | -CA$2.33 |
| PE Ratio | 9.79 | 12.33 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.48 | -9.80 |
| Revenue (TTM) | CA$33.70B | CA$5.93B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | CA$15.11B | CA$2.20B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | CA$5.81B | CA$1.96B |
Correlation
The correlation between POW.TO and FM.TO is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
POW.TO vs. FM.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, POW.TO achieves a 5.35% return, which is significantly lower than FM.TO's 79.08% return. Over the past 10 years, POW.TO has outperformed FM.TO with an annualized return of 8.53%, while FM.TO has yielded a comparatively lower -1.33% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
POW.TO vs. FM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Power Corporation of Canada (POW.TO) and First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (FM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
POW.TO vs. FM.TO - Dividend Comparison
POW.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.43%, more than FM.TO's 0.41% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POW.TO Power Corporation of Canada | 5.43% | 5.54% | 6.22% | 4.40% | 7.51% | 4.77% | 6.13% | 4.36% | 4.38% | 4.23% | 3.65% | 3.63% |
FM.TO First Quantum Minerals Ltd. | 0.41% | 1.94% | 0.58% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.08% | 0.09% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 1.58% | 0.87% | 0.90% |
Drawdowns
POW.TO vs. FM.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POW.TO drawdown since its inception was -62.40%, smaller than the maximum FM.TO drawdown of -90.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POW.TO and FM.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
POW.TO vs. FM.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Power Corporation of Canada (POW.TO) is 4.92%, while First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (FM.TO) has a volatility of 21.01%. This indicates that POW.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
POW.TO vs. FM.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Power Corporation of Canada and First Quantum Minerals Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities