PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
POST vs. QQQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

POST vs. QQQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Post Holdings, Inc. (POST) and Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POST achieves a -8.51% return, which is significantly lower than QQQX's 13.61% return. Over the past 10 years, POST has underperformed QQQX with an annualized return of 6.19%, while QQQX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.66% annualized return.


POST

1D
1.67%
1M
-12.36%
YTD
-8.51%
6M
-8.04%
1Y
-17.77%
3Y*
1.60%
5Y*
3.55%
10Y*
6.19%

QQQX

1D
0.25%
1M
4.90%
YTD
13.61%
6M
17.29%
1Y
35.86%
3Y*
17.11%
5Y*
10.20%
10Y*
13.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

POST vs. QQQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
POST
Post Holdings, Inc.
-8.51%-13.46%29.98%-2.44%22.34%11.60%-7.42%22.41%12.50%-1.44%
QQQX
Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund
13.61%14.87%25.61%21.68%-27.39%25.32%15.75%28.83%-11.68%39.19%

Correlation

The correlation between POST and QQQX is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2012

0.25

The correlation between POST and QQQX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

POST:

$4.90B

QQQX:

$1.39B

EPS

POST:

$5.75

QQQX:

$7.57

PE Ratio

POST:

15.77

QQQX:

3.75

PEG Ratio

POST:

0.19

QQQX:

0.43

PS Ratio

POST:

0.63

QQQX:

8.63

PB Ratio

POST:

1.53

QQQX:

1.01

Total Revenue (TTM)

POST:

$8.45B

QQQX:

$160.60M

Gross Profit (TTM)

POST:

$2.31B

QQQX:

$152.14M

EBITDA (TTM)

POST:

$1.28B

QQQX:

$369.75M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

POST vs. QQQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

POST
POST Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
POST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POST Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
POST Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
POST Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
POST Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQX
QQQX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
QQQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POST vs. QQQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Post Holdings, Inc. (POST) and Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


POSTQQQXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.69

2.47

-3.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.90

3.56

-4.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.46

-0.57

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.81

4.02

-4.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.84

18.86

-20.71

POST vs. QQQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POST Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is lower than the QQQX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POST and QQQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


POSTQQQXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.69

2.47

-3.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.52

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.65

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.49

-0.04

Drawdowns

POST vs. QQQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POST drawdown since its inception was -47.37%, smaller than the maximum QQQX drawdown of -57.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POST and QQQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


POSTQQQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.37%

-57.25%

+9.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.23%

-9.11%

-13.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.17%

-22.80%

-3.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.17%

-29.33%

+3.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.56%

-35.96%

-0.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.93%

-0.19%

-24.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.42%

-8.02%

-1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.79%

1.94%

+7.85%

Volatility

POST vs. QQQX - Volatility Comparison

Post Holdings, Inc. (POST) has a higher volatility of 7.34% compared to Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX) at 3.90%. This indicates that POST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


POSTQQQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.34%

3.90%

+3.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.26%

11.47%

+7.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.78%

14.60%

+11.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.42%

19.81%

+2.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.09%

21.06%

+3.03%

Dividends

POST vs. QQQX - Dividend Comparison

POST has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.24%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
POST
Post Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQX
Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund
7.24%7.85%6.73%7.26%9.66%5.85%6.00%6.49%8.40%5.95%7.54%7.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


POST and QQQX have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

POST has higher volatility (7.34%) compared to QQQX (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POST dropped -47.37% vs QQQX's -57.25%.

QQQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for POST and QQQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer