POST vs. LW
POST (Post Holdings, Inc.) and LW (Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Packaged Foods industry within the Consumer Defensive sector. Over the past 5 years, POST returned 3.55%/yr vs -11.38%/yr for LW. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
POST vs. LW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POST achieves a -8.51% return, which is significantly lower than LW's 1.05% return.
POST
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- -12.36%
- YTD
- -8.51%
- 6M
- -8.04%
- 1Y
- -17.77%
- 3Y*
- 1.60%
- 5Y*
- 3.55%
- 10Y*
- 6.19%
LW
- 1D
- -2.26%
- 1M
- -4.28%
- YTD
- 1.05%
- 6M
- -28.31%
- 1Y
- -21.84%
- 3Y*
- -26.76%
- 5Y*
- -11.38%
- 10Y*
- —
POST vs. LW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POST Post Holdings, Inc. | -8.51% | -13.46% | 29.98% | -2.44% | 22.34% | 11.60% | -7.42% | 22.41% | 12.50% | -1.44% |
LW Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. | 1.05% | -35.69% | -37.01% | 22.32% | 42.89% | -18.40% | -7.23% | 18.27% | 31.81% | 51.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between POST and LW is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2016 | 0.41 |
Fundamentals
POST:
$4.90B
LW:
$5.80B
POST:
$5.75
LW:
$2.15
POST:
15.77
LW:
19.34
POST:
0.19
LW:
0.27
POST:
0.63
LW:
0.89
POST:
1.53
LW:
3.17
POST:
$8.45B
LW:
$6.52B
POST:
$2.31B
LW:
$1.34B
POST:
$1.28B
LW:
$893.90M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POST vs. LW — Risk / Return Rank
POST
LW
POST vs. LW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Post Holdings, Inc. (POST) and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| POST | LW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.69 | -0.50 | -0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.90 | -0.42 | -0.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 0.94 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.81 | -0.56 | -0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.84 | -1.00 | -0.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| POST | LW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.69 | -0.50 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | -0.30 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.14 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
POST vs. LW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POST drawdown since its inception was -47.37%, smaller than the maximum LW drawdown of -64.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POST and LW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| POST | LW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.37% | -64.56% | +17.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.23% | -41.37% | +19.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.17% | -64.56% | +38.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.17% | -64.56% | +38.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.93% | -61.34% | +36.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.42% | -21.19% | +11.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.79% | 23.25% | -13.46% |
Volatility
POST vs. LW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Post Holdings, Inc. (POST) is 7.34%, while Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) has a volatility of 10.58%. This indicates that POST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| POST | LW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.34% | 10.58% | -3.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.26% | 38.23% | -18.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.78% | 44.16% | -18.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.42% | 37.84% | -15.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.09% | 35.88% | -11.79% |
Dividends
POST vs. LW - Dividend Comparison
POST has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LW Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. | 3.60% | 3.53% | 2.15% | 1.04% | 1.10% | 1.48% | 1.17% | 0.93% | 1.04% | 1.33% |
POST Post Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
POST vs. LW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Post Holdings, Inc. and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
POST vs. LW - Profitability Comparison
POST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Post Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 617.60M and revenue of 2.04B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.2%.
LW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 331.60M and revenue of 1.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.2%.
POST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Post Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 211.90M and revenue of 2.04B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.4%.
LW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 126.60M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.
POST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Post Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 81.80M and revenue of 2.04B, resulting in a net margin of 4.0%.
LW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 54.00M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
POST and LW have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LW has higher volatility (10.58%) compared to POST (7.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POST dropped -47.37% vs LW's -64.56%.
LW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.50 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for POST and LW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer