PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
POR vs. DUK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

POR vs. DUK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Portland General Electric Company (POR) and Duke Energy Corporation (DUK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POR achieves a 5.67% return, which is significantly lower than DUK's 7.50% return. Over the past 10 years, POR has underperformed DUK with an annualized return of 5.47%, while DUK has yielded a comparatively higher 8.49% annualized return.


POR

1D
0.02%
1M
0.74%
YTD
5.67%
6M
6.85%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
7.30%
5Y*
5.52%
10Y*
5.47%

DUK

1D
-0.27%
1M
-1.43%
YTD
7.50%
6M
8.34%
1Y
11.09%
3Y*
15.72%
5Y*
8.65%
10Y*
8.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

POR vs. DUK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
POR
Portland General Electric Company
5.67%15.37%5.30%-7.74%-4.00%28.12%-20.19%25.10%3.95%8.31%
DUK
Duke Energy Corporation
7.50%12.72%15.56%-1.63%2.03%19.11%4.77%10.29%7.41%12.96%

Correlation

The correlation between POR and DUK is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2006

0.66

The correlation between POR and DUK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

POR:

$5.56B

DUK:

$96.22B

EPS

POR:

$2.25

DUK:

$6.61

PE Ratio

POR:

22.32

DUK:

18.69

PEG Ratio

POR:

13.87

DUK:

1.46

PS Ratio

POR:

1.61

DUK:

2.89

PB Ratio

POR:

1.35

DUK:

1.80

Total Revenue (TTM)

POR:

$3.48B

DUK:

$33.29B

Gross Profit (TTM)

POR:

$1.67B

DUK:

$19.45B

EBITDA (TTM)

POR:

$1.13B

DUK:

$15.91B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

POR vs. DUK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

POR
POR Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
POR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
POR Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
POR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
POR Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

DUK
DUK Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
DUK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DUK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
DUK Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
DUK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
DUK Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POR vs. DUK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Portland General Electric Company (POR) and Duke Energy Corporation (DUK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PORDUKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.13

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

1.02

+1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.35

2.40

+4.95

POR vs. DUK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POR Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the DUK Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POR and DUK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

POR vs. DUK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POR drawdown since its inception was -53.30%, smaller than the maximum DUK drawdown of -71.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POR and DUK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PORDUKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.30%

-71.92%

+18.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.80%

-10.88%

-1.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.99%

-11.59%

-8.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.54%

-24.16%

-3.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.04%

-37.37%

-7.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.43%

-6.38%

-1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.03%

-10.85%

-3.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.05%

4.64%

-0.59%

Volatility

POR vs. DUK - Volatility Comparison

Portland General Electric Company (POR) has a higher volatility of 6.66% compared to Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) at 5.22%. This indicates that POR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DUK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PORDUKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.66%

5.22%

+1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.97%

11.07%

+2.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.58%

14.79%

+3.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.81%

17.79%

+3.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.08%

20.41%

+3.67%

Dividends

POR vs. DUK - Dividend Comparison

POR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, more than DUK's 3.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DUK
Duke Energy Corporation
3.73%3.60%3.84%4.18%3.86%3.72%4.17%4.11%4.21%4.15%4.33%4.54%
POR
Portland General Electric Company
4.18%4.32%4.53%4.33%3.65%3.21%3.71%2.72%3.11%2.94%2.91%3.24%

Financials

POR vs. DUK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Portland General Electric Company and Duke Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
879.00M
9.18B
(POR) Total Revenue
(DUK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

POR vs. DUK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Portland General Electric Company and Duke Energy Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
58.9%
67.9%
Portfolio components
POR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Portland General Electric Company reported a gross profit of 518.00M and revenue of 879.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.9%.

DUK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Duke Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 6.23B and revenue of 9.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.9%.

POR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Portland General Electric Company reported an operating income of 107.00M and revenue of 879.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.2%.

DUK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Duke Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 2.73B and revenue of 9.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.7%.

POR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Portland General Electric Company reported a net income of 45.00M and revenue of 879.00M, resulting in a net margin of 5.1%.

DUK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Duke Energy Corporation reported a net income of 1.55B and revenue of 9.18B, resulting in a net margin of 16.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


POR and DUK have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

POR has higher volatility (6.66%) compared to DUK (5.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POR dropped -53.30% vs DUK's -71.92%.

POR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for POR and DUK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer