PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PODD vs. DXCM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PODD vs. DXCM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Insulet Corporation (PODD) and DexCom, Inc. (DXCM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PODD achieves a -49.89% return, which is significantly lower than DXCM's 10.67% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PODD having a 16.27% annualized return and DXCM not far behind at 15.84%.


PODD

1D
-3.85%
1M
-18.63%
YTD
-49.89%
6M
-53.91%
1Y
-56.18%
3Y*
-20.27%
5Y*
-11.60%
10Y*
16.27%

DXCM

1D
-1.90%
1M
19.72%
YTD
10.67%
6M
13.96%
1Y
-14.10%
3Y*
-15.69%
5Y*
-4.85%
10Y*
15.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PODD vs. DXCM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PODD
Insulet Corporation
-49.89%8.88%20.32%-26.30%10.64%4.08%49.32%115.83%14.96%83.12%
DXCM
DexCom, Inc.
10.67%-14.66%-37.33%9.58%-15.64%45.23%69.02%82.59%108.75%-3.87%

Correlation

The correlation between PODD and DXCM is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2007

0.47

The correlation between PODD and DXCM shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PODD:

$10.00B

DXCM:

$28.91B

EPS

PODD:

$4.29

DXCM:

$2.31

PE Ratio

PODD:

33.18

DXCM:

31.74

PEG Ratio

PODD:

0.03

DXCM:

0.75

PS Ratio

PODD:

3.46

DXCM:

6.13

PB Ratio

PODD:

7.68

DXCM:

9.78

Total Revenue (TTM)

PODD:

$2.90B

DXCM:

$4.82B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PODD:

$2.06B

DXCM:

$2.96B

EBITDA (TTM)

PODD:

$529.70M

DXCM:

$1.37B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PODD vs. DXCM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PODD
PODD Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
PODD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PODD Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
PODD Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
PODD Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
PODD Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

DXCM
DXCM Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
DXCM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXCM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXCM Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
DXCM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXCM Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PODD vs. DXCM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Insulet Corporation (PODD) and DexCom, Inc. (DXCM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PODDDXCMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.52

-0.35

-1.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-2.51

-0.23

-2.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.69

0.97

-0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.94

-0.37

-0.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-2.11

-0.64

-1.47

PODD vs. DXCM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PODD Sharpe Ratio is -1.52, which is lower than the DXCM Sharpe Ratio of -0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PODD and DXCM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PODDDXCMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.52

-0.35

-1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.27

-0.10

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.33

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.30

-0.06

Drawdowns

PODD vs. DXCM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PODD drawdown since its inception was -90.28%, roughly equal to the maximum DXCM drawdown of -94.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PODD and DXCM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PODDDXCMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.28%

-94.61%

+4.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.63%

-38.75%

-20.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.63%

-60.95%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.31%

-66.32%

+5.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.31%

-66.32%

+5.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.63%

-54.89%

-4.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.87%

-35.99%

+11.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.68%

22.60%

+4.08%

Volatility

PODD vs. DXCM - Volatility Comparison

Insulet Corporation (PODD) has a higher volatility of 16.58% compared to DexCom, Inc. (DXCM) at 13.45%. This indicates that PODD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXCM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PODDDXCMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.58%

13.45%

+3.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.62%

24.59%

+5.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.08%

40.25%

-3.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.61%

46.92%

-4.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.47%

48.44%

-5.97%

Dividends

PODD vs. DXCM - Dividend Comparison

Neither PODD nor DXCM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

PODD vs. DXCM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Insulet Corporation and DexCom, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
761.70M
1.19B
(PODD) Total Revenue
(DXCM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PODD vs. DXCM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Insulet Corporation and DexCom, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

55.0%60.0%65.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
69.5%
63.0%
Portfolio components
PODD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Insulet Corporation reported a gross profit of 529.10M and revenue of 761.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.5%.

DXCM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DexCom, Inc. reported a gross profit of 750.30M and revenue of 1.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.0%.

PODD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Insulet Corporation reported an operating income of 122.10M and revenue of 761.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.0%.

DXCM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DexCom, Inc. reported an operating income of 255.30M and revenue of 1.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.4%.

PODD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Insulet Corporation reported a net income of 91.10M and revenue of 761.70M, resulting in a net margin of 12.0%.

DXCM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DexCom, Inc. reported a net income of 199.50M and revenue of 1.19B, resulting in a net margin of 16.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PODD and DXCM have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PODD has higher volatility (16.58%) compared to DXCM (13.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PODD dropped -90.28% vs DXCM's -94.61%.

DXCM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.35 vs -1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PODD and DXCM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer