PNSAX vs. XSVM

In the year-to-date period, PNSAX achieves a -12.14% return, which is significantly higher than XSVM's -14.29% return. Over the past 10 years, PNSAX has underperformed XSVM with an annualized return of 7.17%, while XSVM has yielded a comparatively higher 7.86% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

PNSAX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than XSVM's 0.39% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund (PNSAX) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current PNSAX Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is higher than the XSVM Sharpe Ratio of -0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PNSAX and XSVM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

PNSAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XSVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%.

The maximum PNSAX drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, roughly equal to the maximum XSVM drawdown of -62.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PNSAX and XSVM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund (PNSAX) has a higher volatility of 13.77% compared to Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) at 12.47%. This indicates that PNSAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.