PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PNRG vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PNRG vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PrimeEnergy Resources Corporation (PNRG) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PNRG achieves a 6.76% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 19.48% return. Over the past 10 years, PNRG has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 11.63%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 69.46% annualized return.


PNRG

1D
0.14%
1M
-15.65%
YTD
6.76%
6M
0.83%
1Y
-2.01%
3Y*
23.47%
5Y*
31.17%
10Y*
11.63%

NVDA

1D
-0.69%
1M
12.28%
YTD
19.48%
6M
22.81%
1Y
62.23%
3Y*
78.33%
5Y*
67.45%
10Y*
69.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PNRG vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PNRG
PrimeEnergy Resources Corporation
6.76%-22.13%106.48%22.42%23.92%62.38%-71.46%115.93%36.02%-4.63%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
19.48%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%

Correlation

The correlation between PNRG and NVDA is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 1999

0.07

The correlation between PNRG and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.10 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

PNRG:

$10.42

NVDA:

$6.53

PE Ratio

PNRG:

17.51

NVDA:

34.15

PEG Ratio

PNRG:

0.03

NVDA:

0.19

PS Ratio

PNRG:

2.25

NVDA:

21.50

Total Revenue (TTM)

PNRG:

$196.05M

NVDA:

$253.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PNRG:

$49.86M

NVDA:

$187.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

PNRG:

$122.02M

NVDA:

$192.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PNRG vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PNRG
PNRG Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
PNRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PNRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
PNRG Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
PNRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
PNRG Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PNRG vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PrimeEnergy Resources Corporation (PNRG) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PNRGNVDADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.03

1.84

-1.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.41

2.47

-2.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.30

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.14

3.21

-3.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.39

7.92

-8.31

PNRG vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PNRG Sharpe Ratio is -0.03, which is lower than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PNRG and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PNRGNVDADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

1.84

-1.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

1.31

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

1.40

-1.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.63

-0.38

Drawdowns

PNRG vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PNRG drawdown since its inception was -81.00%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PNRG and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PNRGNVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.00%

-89.72%

+8.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.61%

-20.21%

-19.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.55%

-36.88%

-7.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.55%

-66.34%

+21.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.00%

-66.34%

-14.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.03%

-5.48%

-27.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.39%

-36.21%

-2.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.09%

8.20%

+5.89%

Volatility

PNRG vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

PrimeEnergy Resources Corporation (PNRG) has a higher volatility of 34.76% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 11.79%. This indicates that PNRG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PNRGNVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

34.76%

11.79%

+22.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.61%

25.29%

+23.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.24%

34.03%

+32.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.24%

51.66%

-1.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.29%

49.80%

+10.49%

Dividends

PNRG vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

PNRG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%
PNRG
PrimeEnergy Resources Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PNRG vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PrimeEnergy Resources Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
44.66M
81.62B
(PNRG) Total Revenue
(NVDA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PNRG and NVDA have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PNRG has higher volatility (34.76%) compared to NVDA (11.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PNRG dropped -81.00% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PNRG and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer