PNOPX vs. FSPGX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

PNOPX (Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund) and FSPGX (Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, PNOPX returned 8.97%/yr vs 14.30%/yr for FSPGX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PNOPX charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for FSPGX.

Performance

PNOPX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund (PNOPX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PNOPX achieves a 3.72% return, which is significantly lower than FSPGX's 4.50% return.

PNOPX

• 1D: 1.39%
• 1M: 0.84%
• YTD: 3.72%
• 6M: 3.46%
• 1Y: 18.23%
• 3Y*: 16.22%
• 5Y*: 8.97%
• 10Y*: 15.17%

FSPGX

• 1D: 1.38%
• 1M: -1.25%
• YTD: 4.50%
• 6M: 3.80%
• 1Y: 22.80%
• 3Y*: 22.67%
• 5Y*: 14.30%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PNOPX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PNOPX Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund	3.72%	10.93%	22.97%	26.23%	-22.86%	23.44%	28.57%	35.86%	-0.90%	29.07%
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	4.50%	18.54%	33.27%	42.77%	-29.17%	27.57%	38.46%	36.38%	-1.79%	27.70%

Correlation

The correlation between PNOPX and FSPGX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017	0.95

The correlation between PNOPX and FSPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PNOPX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PNOPX

PNOPX Risk / Return Rank: 24
PNOPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
PNOPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
PNOPX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
PNOPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
PNOPX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

FSPGX

FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 22
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PNOPX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund (PNOPX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PNOPX	FSPGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.40	1.38	+0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.96	1.90	+0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.24	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.40	1.37	+0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.19	4.51	+0.67

PNOPX vs. FSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PNOPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the FSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PNOPX and FSPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PNOPX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PNOPX drawdown since its inception was -74.15%, which is greater than FSPGX's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PNOPX and FSPGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PNOPX	FSPGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.15%	-32.66%	-41.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.06%	-16.17%	+3.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.90%	-23.32%	+0.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.13%	-32.66%	+3.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.04%	-4.14%	+3.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.00%	-6.36%	-17.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.52%	4.91%	-1.39%

Volatility

PNOPX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund (PNOPX) is 5.32%, while Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) has a volatility of 5.97%. This indicates that PNOPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PNOPX	FSPGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.32%	5.97%	-0.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.50%	12.68%	-2.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.03%	16.13%	-3.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.48%	21.60%	-4.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.20%	21.56%	-3.36%

PNOPX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PNOPX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

PNOPX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison

PNOPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.81%, more than FSPGX's 0.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	0.33%	0.34%	0.37%	0.73%	0.86%	2.22%	1.76%	1.04%	1.32%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%
PNOPX Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund	10.81%	11.22%	9.25%	2.96%	8.38%	11.69%	7.41%	7.14%	20.24%	4.91%	0.00%	12.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PNOPX and FSPGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, PNOPX and FSPGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, PNOPX or FSPGX?

FSPGX has higher volatility (5.97%) compared to PNOPX (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PNOPX dropped -74.15% vs FSPGX's -32.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PNOPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.