PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMO vs. MUNI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PMO vs. MUNI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Municipal Opportunities Trust (PMO) and PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF (MUNI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMO achieves a -0.39% return, which is significantly lower than MUNI's 1.28% return. Over the past 10 years, PMO has outperformed MUNI with an annualized return of 2.47%, while MUNI has yielded a comparatively lower 2.17% annualized return.


PMO

1D
0.19%
1M
1.65%
YTD
-0.39%
6M
3.07%
1Y
11.80%
3Y*
6.51%
5Y*
-1.23%
10Y*
2.47%

MUNI

1D
0.13%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.28%
6M
1.55%
1Y
6.54%
3Y*
3.97%
5Y*
1.30%
10Y*
2.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMO vs. MUNI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PMO
Putnam Municipal Opportunities Trust
-0.39%10.45%3.15%-1.31%-20.32%10.08%9.38%23.13%-4.05%8.89%
MUNI
PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF
1.28%4.72%1.43%6.07%-6.62%0.67%4.83%7.09%0.84%4.86%

Correlation

The correlation between PMO and MUNI is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2009

0.28

The correlation between PMO and MUNI shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PMO vs. MUNI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMO
PMO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
PMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
PMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

MUNI
MUNI Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
MUNI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUNI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUNI Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
MUNI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUNI Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMO vs. MUNI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Municipal Opportunities Trust (PMO) and PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF (MUNI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PMOMUNIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.39

2.90

-1.51

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.21

4.35

-2.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.65

-0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

2.83

-1.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.41

9.33

-3.92

PMO vs. MUNI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the MUNI Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMO and MUNI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PMOMUNIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

2.90

-1.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

0.39

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

0.56

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.78

-0.42

Drawdowns

PMO vs. MUNI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMO drawdown since its inception was -36.46%, which is greater than MUNI's maximum drawdown of -11.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMO and MUNI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMOMUNIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.46%

-11.15%

-25.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.19%

-2.29%

-4.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.20%

-4.09%

-12.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.46%

-11.15%

-25.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.46%

-11.15%

-25.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.65%

-0.75%

-12.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.94%

-1.73%

-6.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

0.69%

+1.48%

Volatility

PMO vs. MUNI - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Municipal Opportunities Trust (PMO) has a higher volatility of 2.87% compared to PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF (MUNI) at 0.78%. This indicates that PMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MUNI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMOMUNIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

0.78%

+2.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.73%

1.61%

+5.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.54%

2.27%

+6.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.02%

3.31%

+11.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.28%

3.85%

+10.43%

Dividends

PMO vs. MUNI - Dividend Comparison

PMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than MUNI's 3.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MUNI
PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF
3.28%3.26%3.50%3.09%2.13%1.62%1.92%2.44%2.38%2.37%2.37%2.20%
PMO
Putnam Municipal Opportunities Trust
4.51%4.25%4.15%4.64%5.87%4.42%4.65%4.85%5.55%5.26%5.89%5.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


PMO and MUNI have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PMO has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to MUNI (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMO dropped -36.46% vs MUNI's -11.15%.

MUNI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PMO and MUNI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer