PLTK vs. CROX
PLTK (Playtika Holding Corp.) and CROX (Crocs, Inc.) are both stocks. PLTK operates in Electronic Gaming & Multimedia (Communication Services), while CROX operates in Footwear & Accessories (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, PLTK returned -32.06%/yr vs 2.84%/yr for CROX. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PLTK vs. CROX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTK achieves a -18.73% return, which is significantly lower than CROX's 38.54% return.
PLTK
- 1D
- -5.03%
- 1M
- -12.05%
- YTD
- -18.73%
- 6M
- -21.65%
- 1Y
- -28.27%
- 3Y*
- -28.30%
- 5Y*
- -32.06%
- 10Y*
- —
CROX
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- 16.75%
- YTD
- 38.54%
- 6M
- 32.60%
- 1Y
- 15.96%
- 3Y*
- 2.49%
- 5Y*
- 2.84%
- 10Y*
- 27.72%
PLTK vs. CROX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLTK Playtika Holding Corp. | -18.73% | -37.16% | -16.05% | 2.47% | -50.78% | -45.32% |
CROX Crocs, Inc. | 38.54% | -21.92% | 17.26% | -13.85% | -15.43% | 70.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTK and CROX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2021 | 0.35 |
Fundamentals
PLTK:
$1.21B
CROX:
$6.01B
PLTK:
-$0.79
CROX:
-$1.94
PLTK:
0.43
CROX:
1.57
PLTK:
$2.79B
CROX:
$4.02B
PLTK:
$2.04B
CROX:
$2.34B
PLTK:
$144.30M
CROX:
$297.04M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTK vs. CROX — Risk / Return Rank
PLTK
CROX
PLTK vs. CROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Playtika Holding Corp. (PLTK) and Crocs, Inc. (CROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PLTK | CROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | 0.31 | -0.87 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | 0.77 | -1.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.12 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | 0.49 | -1.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.17 | 0.83 | -2.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLTK | CROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.56 | 0.31 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.63 | 0.05 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.66 | 0.17 | -0.83 |
Drawdowns
PLTK vs. CROX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTK drawdown since its inception was -90.76%, smaller than the maximum CROX drawdown of -98.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTK and CROX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTK | CROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.76% | -98.74% | +7.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.58% | -32.54% | -10.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.12% | -54.04% | -21.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -89.33% | -73.86% | -15.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.10% | -34.39% | -54.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.88% | -61.29% | -4.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.30% | 19.17% | +5.13% |
Volatility
PLTK vs. CROX - Volatility Comparison
Playtika Holding Corp. (PLTK) has a higher volatility of 15.68% compared to Crocs, Inc. (CROX) at 11.01%. This indicates that PLTK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTK | CROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.68% | 11.01% | +4.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.92% | 32.06% | +6.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.64% | 52.44% | -1.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.76% | 55.11% | -4.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.12% | 55.95% | -5.83% |
Dividends
PLTK vs. CROX - Dividend Comparison
PLTK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.35%, while CROX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CROX Crocs, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PLTK Playtika Holding Corp. | 9.35% | 10.13% | 5.76% |
Financials
PLTK vs. CROX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Playtika Holding Corp. and Crocs, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PLTK vs. CROX - Profitability Comparison
PLTK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Playtika Holding Corp. reported a gross profit of 552.50M and revenue of 744.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.2%.
CROX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported a gross profit of 522.95M and revenue of 921.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.8%.
PLTK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Playtika Holding Corp. reported an operating income of -49.60M and revenue of 744.70M, resulting in an operating margin of -6.7%.
CROX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported an operating income of 200.84M and revenue of 921.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.8%.
PLTK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Playtika Holding Corp. reported a net income of -57.50M and revenue of 744.70M, resulting in a net margin of -7.7%.
CROX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported a net income of 137.56M and revenue of 921.46M, resulting in a net margin of 14.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PLTK and CROX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTK has higher volatility (15.68%) compared to CROX (11.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTK dropped -90.76% vs CROX's -98.74%.
CROX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.31 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLTK and CROX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer