PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PLRG vs. QVML
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


PLRGQVML

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between PLRG and QVML is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

PLRG vs. QVML - Performance Comparison

The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember0
14.71%
PLRG
QVML

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PLRG vs. QVML - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLRG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than QVML's 0.11% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


PLRG
Principal US Large-Cap Adaptive Multi-Factor ETF
Expense ratio chart for PLRG: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%
Expense ratio chart for QVML: current value at 0.11% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.11%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PLRG vs. QVML - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal US Large-Cap Adaptive Multi-Factor ETF (PLRG) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLRG
Sharpe ratio
No data
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PLRG, currently valued at 0.00, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.00
QVML
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for QVML, currently valued at 3.18, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.003.18
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for QVML, currently valued at 4.22, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.004.22
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for QVML, currently valued at 1.59, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.59
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for QVML, currently valued at 4.59, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.59
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for QVML, currently valued at 21.18, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0021.18

PLRG vs. QVML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.00
3.18
PLRG
QVML

Dividends

PLRG vs. QVML - Dividend Comparison

PLRG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QVML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%.


TTM202320222021
PLRG
Principal US Large-Cap Adaptive Multi-Factor ETF
0.00%1.05%2.65%0.52%
QVML
Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF
1.11%1.43%1.72%0.62%

Drawdowns

PLRG vs. QVML - Drawdown Comparison


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-8.46%
0
PLRG
QVML

Volatility

PLRG vs. QVML - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal US Large-Cap Adaptive Multi-Factor ETF (PLRG) is 0.00%, while Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) has a volatility of 3.92%. This indicates that PLRG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QVML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember0
3.92%
PLRG
QVML