PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLNT vs. NVO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PLNT vs. NVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Planet Fitness, Inc. (PLNT) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLNT achieves a -52.68% return, which is significantly lower than NVO's -11.01% return. Over the past 10 years, PLNT has outperformed NVO with an annualized return of 12.55%, while NVO has yielded a comparatively lower 6.56% annualized return.


PLNT

1D
-0.39%
1M
-20.18%
YTD
-52.68%
6M
-53.08%
1Y
-51.26%
3Y*
-8.03%
5Y*
-7.40%
10Y*
12.55%

NVO

1D
4.17%
1M
-2.50%
YTD
-11.01%
6M
-5.65%
1Y
-36.44%
3Y*
-15.71%
5Y*
3.74%
10Y*
6.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLNT vs. NVO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLNT
Planet Fitness, Inc.
-52.68%9.71%35.44%-7.36%-13.01%16.68%3.95%39.28%54.84%72.29%
NVO
Novo Nordisk A/S
-11.01%-39.22%-15.93%54.84%22.66%63.52%23.33%28.70%-12.98%52.92%

Correlation

The correlation between PLNT and NVO is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2015

0.16

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PLNT:

$4.10B

NVO:

$194.63B

EPS

PLNT:

$2.76

NVO:

$27.42

PE Ratio

PLNT:

18.59

NVO:

1.60

PEG Ratio

PLNT:

0.33

NVO:

0.07

PS Ratio

PLNT:

3.07

NVO:

0.59

Total Revenue (TTM)

PLNT:

$1.38B

NVO:

$327.80B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PLNT:

$749.98M

NVO:

$268.30B

EBITDA (TTM)

PLNT:

$526.17M

NVO:

$181.54B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLNT vs. NVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLNT
PLNT Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
PLNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLNT Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
PLNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLNT Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

NVO
NVO Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
NVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVO Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
NVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVO Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLNT vs. NVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Planet Fitness, Inc. (PLNT) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLNTNVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.75

0.89

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

-0.66

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-2.14

-0.99

-1.15

PLNT vs. NVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLNT Sharpe Ratio is -1.14, which is lower than the NVO Sharpe Ratio of -0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLNT and NVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLNTNVODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.14

-0.70

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.19

0.10

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.20

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.47

-0.18

Drawdowns

PLNT vs. NVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLNT drawdown since its inception was -68.72%, smaller than the maximum NVO drawdown of -74.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLNT and NVO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLNTNVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.72%

-74.70%

+5.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.24%

-55.03%

-6.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.24%

-74.70%

+13.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.24%

-74.70%

+13.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.72%

-74.70%

+5.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.80%

-68.21%

+13.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.12%

-17.76%

+2.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.02%

36.98%

-12.96%

Volatility

PLNT vs. NVO - Volatility Comparison

Planet Fitness, Inc. (PLNT) has a higher volatility of 39.75% compared to Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO) at 8.89%. This indicates that PLNT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLNTNVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

39.75%

8.89%

+30.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.09%

38.00%

+6.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.16%

51.88%

-6.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.61%

38.25%

+0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.82%

32.51%

+11.31%

Dividends

PLNT vs. NVO - Dividend Comparison

PLNT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVO
Novo Nordisk A/S
4.12%3.31%1.68%1.00%1.20%1.35%1.87%2.14%1.45%1.52%2.87%0.92%
PLNT
Planet Fitness, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%13.83%0.00%

Financials

PLNT vs. NVO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Planet Fitness, Inc. and Novo Nordisk A/S. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B20222023202420252026
337.24M
96.82B
(PLNT) Total Revenue
(NVO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PLNT vs. NVO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Planet Fitness, Inc. and Novo Nordisk A/S over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
86.6%
86.0%
Portfolio components
PLNT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Planet Fitness, Inc. reported a gross profit of 291.90M and revenue of 337.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.6%.

NVO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Novo Nordisk A/S reported a gross profit of 83.23B and revenue of 96.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.0%.

PLNT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Planet Fitness, Inc. reported an operating income of 98.67M and revenue of 337.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 29.3%.

NVO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Novo Nordisk A/S reported an operating income of 59.62B and revenue of 96.82B, resulting in an operating margin of 61.6%.

PLNT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Planet Fitness, Inc. reported a net income of 51.55M and revenue of 337.24M, resulting in a net margin of 15.3%.

NVO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Novo Nordisk A/S reported a net income of 48.56B and revenue of 96.82B, resulting in a net margin of 50.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PLNT and NVO have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLNT has higher volatility (39.75%) compared to NVO (8.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLNT dropped -68.72% vs NVO's -74.70%.

NVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.70 vs -1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLNT and NVO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer