PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLNT vs. LTH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PLNT vs. LTH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Planet Fitness, Inc. (PLNT) and Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. (LTH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLNT achieves a -50.85% return, which is significantly lower than LTH's 20.96% return.


PLNT

1D
0.81%
1M
-18.46%
YTD
-50.85%
6M
-50.99%
1Y
-49.35%
3Y*
-5.77%
5Y*
-6.65%
10Y*
13.09%

LTH

1D
2.58%
1M
20.55%
YTD
20.96%
6M
19.56%
1Y
8.43%
3Y*
16.76%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLNT vs. LTH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PLNT
Planet Fitness, Inc.
-50.85%9.71%35.44%-7.36%-13.01%13.64%
LTH
Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.
20.96%20.16%46.68%26.09%-30.51%-3.04%

Correlation

The correlation between PLNT and LTH is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2021

0.51

The correlation between PLNT and LTH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PLNT:

$4.25B

LTH:

$7.31B

EPS

PLNT:

$2.76

LTH:

$1.70

PE Ratio

PLNT:

19.31

LTH:

18.88

PEG Ratio

PLNT:

0.35

LTH:

0.22

PS Ratio

PLNT:

3.19

LTH:

2.37

Total Revenue (TTM)

PLNT:

$1.38B

LTH:

$3.08B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PLNT:

$749.98M

LTH:

$3.02B

EBITDA (TTM)

PLNT:

$526.17M

LTH:

$864.89M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLNT vs. LTH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLNT
PLNT Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
PLNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLNT Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
PLNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLNT Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

LTH
LTH Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
LTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTH Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
LTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTH Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLNT vs. LTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Planet Fitness, Inc. (PLNT) and Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. (LTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLNTLTHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.10

0.22

-1.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.46

0.64

-2.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.76

1.08

-0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.79

0.65

-1.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-2.05

1.21

-3.25

PLNT vs. LTH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLNT Sharpe Ratio is -1.10, which is lower than the LTH Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLNT and LTH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLNTLTHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.10

0.22

-1.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.29

+0.01

Drawdowns

PLNT vs. LTH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLNT drawdown since its inception was -68.72%, which is greater than LTH's maximum drawdown of -58.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLNT and LTH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLNTLTHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.72%

-58.36%

-10.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.24%

-19.24%

-42.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.24%

-49.10%

-12.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.05%

-4.85%

-48.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.09%

-21.97%

+6.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.52%

10.30%

+13.22%

Volatility

PLNT vs. LTH - Volatility Comparison

Planet Fitness, Inc. (PLNT) has a higher volatility of 39.82% compared to Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. (LTH) at 20.17%. This indicates that PLNT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLNTLTHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

39.82%

20.17%

+19.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.05%

29.13%

+14.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.13%

38.56%

+6.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.58%

47.66%

-9.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.82%

47.66%

-3.84%

Dividends

PLNT vs. LTH - Dividend Comparison

Neither PLNT nor LTH has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
LTH
Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PLNT
Planet Fitness, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%13.83%

Financials

PLNT vs. LTH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Planet Fitness, Inc. and Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
337.24M
788.70M
(PLNT) Total Revenue
(LTH) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PLNT vs. LTH - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Planet Fitness, Inc. and Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
86.6%
88.6%
Portfolio components
PLNT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Planet Fitness, Inc. reported a gross profit of 291.90M and revenue of 337.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.6%.

LTH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 698.81M and revenue of 788.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 88.6%.

PLNT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Planet Fitness, Inc. reported an operating income of 98.67M and revenue of 337.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 29.3%.

LTH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 134.84M and revenue of 788.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.1%.

PLNT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Planet Fitness, Inc. reported a net income of 51.55M and revenue of 337.24M, resulting in a net margin of 15.3%.

LTH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 88.10M and revenue of 788.70M, resulting in a net margin of 11.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PLNT and LTH have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLNT has higher volatility (39.82%) compared to LTH (20.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLNT dropped -68.72% vs LTH's -58.36%.

LTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.22 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLNT and LTH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer