PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLNT vs. ABBV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PLNT vs. ABBV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Planet Fitness, Inc. (PLNT) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLNT achieves a -48.46% return, which is significantly lower than ABBV's 12.42% return. Over the past 10 years, PLNT has underperformed ABBV with an annualized return of 12.24%, while ABBV has yielded a comparatively higher 18.94% annualized return.


PLNT

1D
-0.13%
1M
4.60%
6M
-38.59%
YTD
-48.46%
1Y
-48.04%
3Y*
-6.03%
5Y*
-5.76%
10Y*
12.24%
ALL TIME*
14.41%

ABBV

1D
-2.51%
1M
-3.20%
6M
14.27%
YTD
12.42%
1Y
32.53%
3Y*
23.28%
5Y*
20.99%
10Y*
18.94%
ALL TIME*
20.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.40B$1.53B$1.60B
$108.06M$92.30M$130.27M

PLNT vs. ABBV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLNT
Planet Fitness, Inc.
-48.46%9.71%35.44%-7.36%-13.01%16.68%3.95%39.28%54.84%72.29%
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
12.42%33.08%18.86%-0.23%24.01%32.43%27.72%1.47%-0.96%60.07%

Correlation

The correlation between PLNT and ABBV is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2015

0.16

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PLNT:

$4.44B

ABBV:

$443.24B

EPS

PLNT:

$2.78

ABBV:

$2.05

PE Ratio

PLNT:

20.14

ABBV:

122.29

PS Ratio

PLNT:

3.33

ABBV:

7.08

Total Revenue (TTM)

PLNT:

$1.38B

ABBV:

$62.82B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PLNT:

$749.98M

ABBV:

$46.15B

EBITDA (TTM)

PLNT:

$526.17M

ABBV:

$17.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLNT vs. ABBV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PLNT
PLNT Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
PLNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLNT Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
PLNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLNT Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

ABBV
ABBV Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
ABBV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABBV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABBV Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ABBV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABBV Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PLNT vs. ABBV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Planet Fitness, Inc. (PLNT) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLNTABBVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

1.26

-0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.81

2.14

-2.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.56

4.73

-6.30

PLNT vs. ABBV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLNT Sharpe Ratio is -1.07, which is lower than the ABBV Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLNT and ABBV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLNT vs. ABBV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLNT drawdown since its inception was -68.72%, which is greater than ABBV's maximum drawdown of -45.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLNT and ABBV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLNTABBVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.72%

-45.09%

-23.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.69%

-17.32%

-43.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.24%

-20.74%

-40.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.24%

-21.92%

-39.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.72%

-45.09%

-23.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.76%

-4.69%

-46.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.66%

-10.64%

-5.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.21%

7.81%

+23.40%

Volatility

PLNT vs. ABBV - Volatility Comparison

Planet Fitness, Inc. (PLNT) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) have volatilities of 8.26% and 8.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLNTABBVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.26%

8.35%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.07%

19.56%

+25.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.80%

26.14%

+19.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.74%

23.46%

+15.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.61%

25.92%

+17.69%

Dividends

PLNT vs. ABBV - Dividend Comparison

PLNT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ABBV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
2.72%2.87%3.49%3.82%3.49%3.84%4.41%4.83%3.89%2.65%3.64%3.41%
PLNT
Planet Fitness, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%13.83%0.00%

Financials

PLNT vs. ABBV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Planet Fitness, Inc. and AbbVie Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

PLNT vs. ABBV - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Planet Fitness, Inc. and AbbVie Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

PLNT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Planet Fitness, Inc. reported a gross profit of 291.90M and revenue of 337.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.6%.

ABBV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported a gross profit of 12.53B and revenue of 15.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.5%.

PLNT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Planet Fitness, Inc. reported an operating income of 98.67M and revenue of 337.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 29.3%.

ABBV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported an operating income of 4.73B and revenue of 15.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.6%.

PLNT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Planet Fitness, Inc. reported a net income of 51.55M and revenue of 337.24M, resulting in a net margin of 15.3%.

ABBV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported a net income of 699.00M and revenue of 15.00B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PLNT and ABBV have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ABBV has higher volatility (8.35%) compared to PLNT (8.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLNT dropped -68.72% vs ABBV's -45.09%.

ABBV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLNT and ABBV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer