PortfoliosLab logo
PLL vs. MP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between PLL and MP is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

PLL vs. MP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Piedmont Lithium Inc. (PLL) and MP Materials Corp. (MP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PLL:

-0.69

MP:

0.15

Sortino Ratio

PLL:

-0.95

MP:

0.69

Omega Ratio

PLL:

0.90

MP:

1.08

Calmar Ratio

PLL:

-0.63

MP:

0.08

Martin Ratio

PLL:

-1.35

MP:

0.39

Ulcer Index

PLL:

43.85%

MP:

17.70%

Daily Std Dev

PLL:

88.95%

MP:

67.71%

Max Drawdown

PLL:

-93.46%

MP:

-81.99%

Current Drawdown

PLL:

-92.38%

MP:

-66.53%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PLL:

$139.80M

MP:

$3.37B

EPS

PLL:

-$2.79

MP:

-$0.63

PS Ratio

PLL:

1.31

MP:

15.62

PB Ratio

PLL:

0.49

MP:

3.26

Total Revenue (TTM)

PLL:

$106.47M

MP:

$215.98M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PLL:

$10.24M

MP:

$4.83M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLL achieves a -28.72% return, which is significantly lower than MP's 25.00% return.


PLL

YTD

-28.72%

1M

-7.98%

6M

-40.50%

1Y

-61.28%

3Y*

-52.47%

5Y*

-4.51%

10Y*

N/A

MP

YTD

25.00%

1M

-15.91%

6M

6.97%

1Y

10.36%

3Y*

-20.09%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Piedmont Lithium Inc.

MP Materials Corp.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PLL vs. MP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PLL is 1313
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PLL is 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PLL is 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PLL is 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PLL is 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PLL is 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

MP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MP is 5656
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MP is 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MP is 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MP is 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MP is 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MP is 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PLL vs. MP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Piedmont Lithium Inc. (PLL) and MP Materials Corp. (MP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PLL Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is lower than the MP Sharpe Ratio of 0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLL and MP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

PLL vs. MP - Dividend Comparison

Neither PLL nor MP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

PLL vs. MP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLL drawdown since its inception was -93.46%, which is greater than MP's maximum drawdown of -81.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLL and MP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

PLL vs. MP - Volatility Comparison

Piedmont Lithium Inc. (PLL) has a higher volatility of 26.02% compared to MP Materials Corp. (MP) at 19.43%. This indicates that PLL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

PLL vs. MP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Piedmont Lithium Inc. and MP Materials Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M20212022202320242025
20.00M
60.81M
(PLL) Total Revenue
(MP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PLL vs. MP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Piedmont Lithium Inc. and MP Materials Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-100.0%-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
0.7%
-15.5%
(PLL) Gross Margin
(MP) Gross Margin
PLL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Piedmont Lithium Inc. reported a gross profit of 134.00K and revenue of 20.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.7%.

MP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, MP Materials Corp. reported a gross profit of -9.41M and revenue of 60.81M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -15.5%.

PLL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Piedmont Lithium Inc. reported an operating income of -6.64M and revenue of 20.00M, resulting in an operating margin of -33.2%.

MP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, MP Materials Corp. reported an operating income of -33.80M and revenue of 60.81M, resulting in an operating margin of -55.6%.

PLL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Piedmont Lithium Inc. reported a net income of -15.63M and revenue of 20.00M, resulting in a net margin of -78.2%.

MP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, MP Materials Corp. reported a net income of -22.65M and revenue of 60.81M, resulting in a net margin of -37.2%.