PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PLL vs. CHPT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


PLLCHPT
YTD Return-59.40%-51.71%
1Y Return-57.46%-57.99%
3Y Return (Ann)-43.75%-64.86%
5Y Return (Ann)8.86%-35.02%
Sharpe Ratio-0.64-0.63
Sortino Ratio-0.82-0.66
Omega Ratio0.920.92
Calmar Ratio-0.65-0.60
Martin Ratio-1.06-1.25
Ulcer Index56.10%47.02%
Daily Std Dev92.88%93.15%
Max Drawdown-91.82%-97.55%
Current Drawdown-85.97%-97.55%

Fundamentals


PLLCHPT
Market Cap$222.66M$487.69M
EPS-$2.03-$0.97
Total Revenue (TTM)$19.32M$331.41M
Gross Profit (TTM)-$16.77M$69.97M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between PLL and CHPT is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

PLL vs. CHPT - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, PLL achieves a -59.40% return, which is significantly lower than CHPT's -51.71% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-13.25%
-26.15%
PLL
CHPT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PLL vs. CHPT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Piedmont Lithium Inc. (PLL) and ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLL
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PLL, currently valued at -0.64, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.64
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PLL, currently valued at -0.82, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.82
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PLL, currently valued at 0.92, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.92
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PLL, currently valued at -0.65, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.65
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PLL, currently valued at -1.06, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-1.06
CHPT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CHPT, currently valued at -0.63, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.63
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CHPT, currently valued at -0.66, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.66
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CHPT, currently valued at 0.92, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.92
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CHPT, currently valued at -0.60, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.60
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CHPT, currently valued at -1.25, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-1.25

PLL vs. CHPT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLL Sharpe Ratio is -0.64, which is comparable to the CHPT Sharpe Ratio of -0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLL and CHPT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.20-1.00-0.80-0.60JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.64
-0.63
PLL
CHPT

Dividends

PLL vs. CHPT - Dividend Comparison

Neither PLL nor CHPT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

PLL vs. CHPT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLL drawdown since its inception was -91.82%, smaller than the maximum CHPT drawdown of -97.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLL and CHPT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-95.00%-90.00%-85.00%-80.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-85.97%
-97.55%
PLL
CHPT

Volatility

PLL vs. CHPT - Volatility Comparison

Piedmont Lithium Inc. (PLL) has a higher volatility of 32.44% compared to ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT) at 20.55%. This indicates that PLL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHPT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
32.44%
20.55%
PLL
CHPT

Financials

PLL vs. CHPT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Piedmont Lithium Inc. and ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items