PortfoliosLab logo
PLL vs. CHPT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between PLL and CHPT is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

PLL vs. CHPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Piedmont Lithium Inc. (PLL) and ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PLL:

-0.69

CHPT:

-0.73

Sortino Ratio

PLL:

-0.95

CHPT:

-1.12

Omega Ratio

PLL:

0.90

CHPT:

0.88

Calmar Ratio

PLL:

-0.63

CHPT:

-0.64

Martin Ratio

PLL:

-1.35

CHPT:

-1.25

Ulcer Index

PLL:

43.85%

CHPT:

50.86%

Daily Std Dev

PLL:

88.95%

CHPT:

82.38%

Max Drawdown

PLL:

-93.46%

CHPT:

-98.83%

Current Drawdown

PLL:

-92.38%

CHPT:

-98.49%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PLL:

$139.80M

CHPT:

$319.18M

EPS

PLL:

-$2.79

CHPT:

-$0.64

PS Ratio

PLL:

1.31

CHPT:

0.77

PB Ratio

PLL:

0.49

CHPT:

2.32

Total Revenue (TTM)

PLL:

$106.47M

CHPT:

$310.04M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PLL:

$10.24M

CHPT:

$77.07M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLL achieves a -28.72% return, which is significantly higher than CHPT's -35.03% return.


PLL

YTD

-28.72%

1M

-7.98%

6M

-40.50%

1Y

-61.28%

3Y*

-52.47%

5Y*

-4.51%

10Y*

N/A

CHPT

YTD

-35.03%

1M

20.38%

6M

-36.22%

1Y

-60.05%

3Y*

-60.19%

5Y*

-41.15%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Piedmont Lithium Inc.

ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PLL vs. CHPT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PLL is 1313
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PLL is 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PLL is 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PLL is 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PLL is 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PLL is 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

CHPT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CHPT is 1212
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CHPT is 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CHPT is 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CHPT is 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CHPT is 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CHPT is 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PLL vs. CHPT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Piedmont Lithium Inc. (PLL) and ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PLL Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is comparable to the CHPT Sharpe Ratio of -0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLL and CHPT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

PLL vs. CHPT - Dividend Comparison

Neither PLL nor CHPT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

PLL vs. CHPT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLL drawdown since its inception was -93.46%, smaller than the maximum CHPT drawdown of -98.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLL and CHPT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

PLL vs. CHPT - Volatility Comparison

Piedmont Lithium Inc. (PLL) has a higher volatility of 26.02% compared to ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT) at 16.43%. This indicates that PLL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHPT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

PLL vs. CHPT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Piedmont Lithium Inc. and ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M20212022202320242025
20.00M
101.89M
(PLL) Total Revenue
(CHPT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PLL vs. CHPT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Piedmont Lithium Inc. and ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
0.7%
28.2%
(PLL) Gross Margin
(CHPT) Gross Margin
PLL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Piedmont Lithium Inc. reported a gross profit of 134.00K and revenue of 20.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.7%.

CHPT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 28.70M and revenue of 101.89M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.2%.

PLL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Piedmont Lithium Inc. reported an operating income of -6.64M and revenue of 20.00M, resulting in an operating margin of -33.2%.

CHPT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -54.95M and revenue of 101.89M, resulting in an operating margin of -53.9%.

PLL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Piedmont Lithium Inc. reported a net income of -15.63M and revenue of 20.00M, resulting in a net margin of -78.2%.

CHPT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of -58.80M and revenue of 101.89M, resulting in a net margin of -57.7%.