PLL vs. ALB
Compare and contrast key facts about Piedmont Lithium Inc. (PLL) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PLL or ALB.
Key characteristics
| PLL | ALB | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -52.71% | -24.25% |
| 1Y Return | -53.89% | -12.42% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -40.89% | -26.22% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 13.73% | 11.65% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.52 | -0.07 |
| Sortino Ratio | -0.40 | 0.34 |
| Omega Ratio | 0.96 | 1.04 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.52 | -0.05 |
| Martin Ratio | -0.85 | -0.14 |
| Ulcer Index | 56.46% | 28.63% |
| Daily Std Dev | 93.15% | 59.63% |
| Max Drawdown | -91.82% | -77.22% |
| Current Drawdown | -83.66% | -66.02% |
Fundamentals
| PLL | ALB | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $235.97M | $12.08B |
| EPS | -$2.03 | -$16.76 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $19.32M | $6.50B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | -$16.77M | $689.47M |
Correlation
The correlation between PLL and ALB is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
PLL vs. ALB - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, PLL achieves a -52.71% return, which is significantly lower than ALB's -24.25% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PLL vs. ALB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Piedmont Lithium Inc. (PLL) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PLL vs. ALB - Dividend Comparison
PLL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ALB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLL Piedmont Lithium Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ALB Albemarle Corporation | 1.48% | 1.11% | 0.73% | 0.67% | 1.04% | 2.02% | 1.74% | 1.00% | 1.42% | 2.07% | 1.83% | 1.51% |
Drawdowns
PLL vs. ALB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLL drawdown since its inception was -91.82%, which is greater than ALB's maximum drawdown of -77.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLL and ALB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PLL vs. ALB - Volatility Comparison
Piedmont Lithium Inc. (PLL) has a higher volatility of 32.53% compared to Albemarle Corporation (ALB) at 16.73%. This indicates that PLL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
PLL vs. ALB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Piedmont Lithium Inc. and Albemarle Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities