PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PLL vs. ALB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between PLL and ALB is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.4

Performance

PLL vs. ALB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Piedmont Lithium Inc. (PLL) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-63.40%
-59.24%
PLL
ALB

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PLL:

-0.63

ALB:

-0.91

Sortino Ratio

PLL:

-0.76

ALB:

-1.40

Omega Ratio

PLL:

0.92

ALB:

0.84

Calmar Ratio

PLL:

-0.59

ALB:

-0.63

Martin Ratio

PLL:

-1.36

ALB:

-1.63

Ulcer Index

PLL:

40.60%

ALB:

32.42%

Daily Std Dev

PLL:

87.92%

ALB:

58.34%

Max Drawdown

PLL:

-93.46%

ALB:

-83.90%

Current Drawdown

PLL:

-91.96%

ALB:

-83.22%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PLL:

$150.75M

ALB:

$6.22B

EPS

PLL:

-$3.16

ALB:

-$11.20

PS Ratio

PLL:

1.51

ALB:

1.16

PB Ratio

PLL:

0.48

ALB:

0.81

Total Revenue (TTM)

PLL:

$86.48M

ALB:

$4.02B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PLL:

$10.10M

ALB:

$23.60M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLL achieves a -24.83% return, which is significantly higher than ALB's -38.19% return.


PLL

YTD

-24.83%

1M

-7.07%

6M

-43.39%

1Y

-47.19%

5Y*

4.85%

10Y*

N/A

ALB

YTD

-38.19%

1M

-33.44%

6M

-43.85%

1Y

-51.82%

5Y*

-1.88%

10Y*

0.35%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PLL vs. ALB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PLL is 1919
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PLL is 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PLL is 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PLL is 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PLL is 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PLL is 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

ALB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ALB is 1010
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ALB is 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ALB is 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ALB is 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ALB is 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ALB is 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PLL vs. ALB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Piedmont Lithium Inc. (PLL) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PLL, currently valued at -0.58, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
PLL: -0.58
ALB: -0.91
The chart of Sortino ratio for PLL, currently valued at -0.62, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
PLL: -0.62
ALB: -1.40
The chart of Omega ratio for PLL, currently valued at 0.94, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
PLL: 0.94
ALB: 0.84
The chart of Calmar ratio for PLL, currently valued at -0.55, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.00
PLL: -0.55
ALB: -0.63
The chart of Martin ratio for PLL, currently valued at -1.26, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
PLL: -1.26
ALB: -1.63

The current PLL Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is higher than the ALB Sharpe Ratio of -0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLL and ALB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.80-0.60-0.40-0.200.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.58
-0.91
PLL
ALB

Dividends

PLL vs. ALB - Dividend Comparison

PLL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ALB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PLL
Piedmont Lithium Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ALB
Albemarle Corporation
3.05%1.87%1.11%0.73%0.67%1.04%2.01%1.74%1.00%1.42%2.07%1.83%

Drawdowns

PLL vs. ALB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLL drawdown since its inception was -93.46%, which is greater than ALB's maximum drawdown of -83.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLL and ALB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-90.00%-85.00%-80.00%-75.00%-70.00%-65.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-91.96%
-83.22%
PLL
ALB

Volatility

PLL vs. ALB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Piedmont Lithium Inc. (PLL) is 19.19%, while Albemarle Corporation (ALB) has a volatility of 29.57%. This indicates that PLL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
19.19%
29.57%
PLL
ALB

Financials

PLL vs. ALB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Piedmont Lithium Inc. and Albemarle Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab