PLG vs. TMUS
Compare and contrast key facts about Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (PLG) and T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS).
Performance
PLG vs. TMUS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PLG vs. TMUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLG Platinum Group Metals Ltd. | -25.00% | 84.37% | 12.28% | -34.48% | 10.13% | -65.95% | 174.56% | 13.42% | -50.99% | -78.74% |
TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | 3.94% | -6.58% | 39.70% | 15.02% | 20.71% | -13.99% | 71.96% | 23.28% | 0.16% | 10.43% |
Fundamentals
PLG:
$204.30M
TMUS:
$234.69B
PLG:
-$0.04
TMUS:
$9.76
PLG:
4.60
TMUS:
3.96
PLG:
$0.00
TMUS:
$88.31B
PLG:
-$68.12K
TMUS:
$38.07B
PLG:
-$4.42M
TMUS:
$28.41B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLG achieves a -25.00% return, which is significantly lower than TMUS's 3.94% return. Over the past 10 years, PLG has underperformed TMUS with an annualized return of -26.54%, while TMUS has yielded a comparatively higher 18.69% annualized return.
PLG
- 1D
- 9.26%
- 1M
- -35.87%
- YTD
- -25.00%
- 6M
- -33.21%
- 1Y
- 42.74%
- 3Y*
- 7.37%
- 5Y*
- -15.09%
- 10Y*
- -26.54%
TMUS
- 1D
- -1.83%
- 1M
- -3.25%
- YTD
- 3.94%
- 6M
- -11.40%
- 1Y
- -19.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.68%
- 5Y*
- 11.34%
- 10Y*
- 18.69%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLG vs. TMUS — Risk / Return Rank
PLG
TMUS
PLG vs. TMUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (PLG) and T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PLG | TMUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.51 | -0.74 | +1.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.26 | -0.86 | +2.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.88 | +0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | -0.63 | +1.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.17 | -1.15 | +3.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLG | TMUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 | -0.74 | +1.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.21 | 0.48 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.33 | 0.72 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.21 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between PLG and TMUS is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PLG vs. TMUS - Dividend Comparison
PLG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TMUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PLG Platinum Group Metals Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | 1.81% | 1.80% | 1.28% | 0.41% |
Drawdowns
PLG vs. TMUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLG drawdown since its inception was -99.81%, which is greater than TMUS's maximum drawdown of -86.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLG and TMUS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLG | TMUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.81% | -86.29% | -13.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.74% | -30.79% | -22.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.57% | -31.99% | -49.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -97.73% | -31.99% | -65.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.62% | -21.70% | -77.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.56% | -25.93% | -42.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.84% | 16.90% | +4.94% |
Volatility
PLG vs. TMUS - Volatility Comparison
Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (PLG) has a higher volatility of 23.70% compared to T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) at 5.94%. This indicates that PLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PLG | TMUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.70% | 5.94% | +17.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 67.00% | 17.26% | +49.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 84.32% | 27.02% | +57.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.25% | 23.62% | +48.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.70% | 25.87% | +54.83% |
Financials
PLG vs. TMUS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Platinum Group Metals Ltd. and T-Mobile US, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities