PLG vs. ASM
PLG (Platinum Group Metals Ltd.) and ASM (Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Other Precious Metals & Mining industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 10 years, PLG returned -27.63%/yr vs 6.41%/yr for ASM. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PLG vs. ASM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLG achieves a -47.03% return, which is significantly lower than ASM's -11.27% return. Over the past 10 years, PLG has underperformed ASM with an annualized return of -27.63%, while ASM has yielded a comparatively higher 6.41% annualized return.
PLG
- 1D
- -3.85%
- 1M
- -20.89%
- 6M
- -55.36%
- YTD
- -47.03%
- 1Y
- -31.32%
- 3Y*
- -3.94%
- 5Y*
- -16.06%
- 10Y*
- -27.63%
ASM
- 1D
- -7.08%
- 1M
- -20.72%
- 6M
- -19.68%
- YTD
- -11.27%
- 1Y
- 38.79%
- 3Y*
- 96.16%
- 5Y*
- 39.58%
- 10Y*
- 6.41%
PLG vs. ASM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLG Platinum Group Metals Ltd. | -47.03% | 84.37% | 12.28% | -34.48% | 10.13% | -65.95% | 174.56% | 13.42% | -50.99% | -78.74% |
ASM Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. | -11.27% | 604.88% | 68.13% | -22.95% | -21.01% | -33.77% | 124.14% | -4.92% | -54.48% | -2.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLG and ASM is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2005 | 0.30 |
Over the past year, PLG and ASM have become more correlated (0.71) than their long-term average of 0.30, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
PLG:
$158.53M
ASM:
$937.81M
PLG:
-$0.03
ASM:
$0.22
PLG:
2.24
ASM:
3.46
PLG:
$0.00
ASM:
$110.70M
PLG:
-$16.96K
ASM:
$59.09M
PLG:
-$4.34M
ASM:
$55.20M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLG vs. ASM — Risk / Return Rank
PLG
ASM
PLG vs. ASM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (PLG) and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLG | ASM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.14 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 0.74 | -1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.87 | 1.41 | -2.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLG vs. ASM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLG drawdown since its inception was -99.81%, which is greater than ASM's maximum drawdown of -94.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLG and ASM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLG | ASM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.81% | -94.10% | -5.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -64.08% | -52.40% | -11.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.08% | -52.40% | -11.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.33% | -60.57% | -8.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -97.38% | -90.04% | -7.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.73% | -50.98% | -48.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.92% | -63.68% | -5.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.89% | 27.60% | +8.29% |
Volatility
PLG vs. ASM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (PLG) is 13.60%, while Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) has a volatility of 20.61%. This indicates that PLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLG | ASM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.60% | 20.61% | -7.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.04% | 67.12% | -9.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 81.38% | 82.79% | -1.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.90% | 66.46% | +5.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.02% | 69.84% | +10.18% |
Dividends
PLG vs. ASM - Dividend Comparison
Neither PLG nor ASM has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
PLG vs. ASM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Platinum Group Metals Ltd. and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PLG and ASM have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASM has higher volatility (20.61%) compared to PLG (13.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLG dropped -99.81% vs ASM's -94.10%.
ASM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLG and ASM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer