PLG vs. ASM

In the year-to-date period, PLG achieves a 14.06% return, which is significantly lower than ASM's 264.36% return. Over the past 10 years, PLG has underperformed ASM with an annualized return of -28.65%, while ASM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.30% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (PLG) and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current PLG Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is lower than the ASM Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLG and ASM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither PLG nor ASM has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum PLG drawdown since its inception was -99.81%, which is greater than ASM's maximum drawdown of -94.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLG and ASM.

The current volatility for Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (PLG) is 19.02%, while Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) has a volatility of 23.71%. This indicates that PLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Platinum Group Metals Ltd. and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.