PLG vs. ASM
Compare and contrast key facts about Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (PLG) and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM).
Performance
PLG vs. ASM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PLG vs. ASM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLG Platinum Group Metals Ltd. | -25.00% | 84.37% | 12.28% | -34.48% | 10.13% | -65.95% | 174.56% | 13.42% | -50.99% | -78.74% |
ASM Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. | 1.77% | 604.88% | 68.13% | -22.95% | -21.01% | -33.77% | 124.14% | -4.92% | -54.48% | -2.19% |
Fundamentals
PLG:
$204.30M
ASM:
$1.04B
PLG:
-$0.04
ASM:
$0.17
PLG:
4.60
ASM:
4.45
PLG:
$0.00
ASM:
$88.12M
PLG:
-$68.12K
ASM:
$44.14M
PLG:
-$4.42M
ASM:
$39.90M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLG achieves a -25.00% return, which is significantly lower than ASM's 1.77% return. Over the past 10 years, PLG has underperformed ASM with an annualized return of -26.54%, while ASM has yielded a comparatively higher 20.13% annualized return.
PLG
- 1D
- 9.26%
- 1M
- -35.87%
- YTD
- -25.00%
- 6M
- -33.21%
- 1Y
- 42.74%
- 3Y*
- 7.37%
- 5Y*
- -15.09%
- 10Y*
- -26.54%
ASM
- 1D
- 8.78%
- 1M
- -34.30%
- YTD
- 1.77%
- 6M
- 20.38%
- 1Y
- 243.48%
- 3Y*
- 92.57%
- 5Y*
- 37.41%
- 10Y*
- 20.13%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLG vs. ASM — Risk / Return Rank
PLG
ASM
PLG vs. ASM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (PLG) and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PLG | ASM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.51 | 2.93 | -2.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.26 | 3.03 | -1.77 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.38 | -0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | 4.47 | -3.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.17 | 13.63 | -11.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLG | ASM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 | 2.93 | -2.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.21 | 0.58 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.33 | 0.29 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.09 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between PLG and ASM is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PLG vs. ASM - Dividend Comparison
Neither PLG nor ASM has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
PLG vs. ASM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLG drawdown since its inception was -99.81%, which is greater than ASM's maximum drawdown of -94.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLG and ASM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLG | ASM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.81% | -94.10% | -5.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.74% | -52.40% | -1.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.57% | -70.08% | -11.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -97.73% | -90.91% | -6.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.62% | -43.77% | -55.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.56% | -64.02% | -4.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.84% | 17.20% | +4.64% |
Volatility
PLG vs. ASM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (PLG) is 23.70%, while Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) has a volatility of 28.16%. This indicates that PLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PLG | ASM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.70% | 28.16% | -4.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 67.00% | 67.30% | -0.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 84.32% | 83.71% | +0.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.25% | 65.03% | +7.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.70% | 70.32% | +10.38% |
Financials
PLG vs. ASM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Platinum Group Metals Ltd. and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities