PLG vs. ASM
PLG (Platinum Group Metals Ltd.) and ASM (Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Other Precious Metals & Mining industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 10 years, PLG returned -26.75%/yr vs 9.99%/yr for ASM. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PLG vs. ASM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLG achieves a -42.37% return, which is significantly lower than ASM's -5.31% return. Over the past 10 years, PLG has underperformed ASM with an annualized return of -26.75%, while ASM has yielded a comparatively higher 9.99% annualized return.
PLG
- 1D
- -2.86%
- 1M
- -15.53%
- YTD
- -42.37%
- 6M
- -52.11%
- 1Y
- -8.72%
- 3Y*
- -0.49%
- 5Y*
- -18.10%
- 10Y*
- -26.75%
ASM
- 1D
- -8.41%
- 1M
- -9.95%
- YTD
- -5.31%
- 6M
- -13.91%
- 1Y
- 69.94%
- 3Y*
- 107.69%
- 5Y*
- 38.35%
- 10Y*
- 9.99%
PLG vs. ASM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLG Platinum Group Metals Ltd. | -42.37% | 84.37% | 12.28% | -34.48% | 10.13% | -65.95% | 174.56% | 13.42% | -50.99% | -78.74% |
ASM Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. | -5.31% | 604.88% | 68.13% | -22.95% | -21.01% | -33.77% | 124.14% | -4.92% | -54.48% | -2.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLG and ASM is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2005 | 0.30 |
Over the past year, PLG and ASM have become more correlated (0.69) than their long-term average of 0.30, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
PLG:
$168.19M
ASM:
$1.02B
PLG:
-$0.05
ASM:
$0.23
PLG:
2.33
ASM:
3.70
PLG:
$0.00
ASM:
$110.70M
PLG:
-$67.43K
ASM:
$59.09M
PLG:
-$5.70M
ASM:
$55.20M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLG vs. ASM — Risk / Return Rank
PLG
ASM
PLG vs. ASM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (PLG) and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLG | ASM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.19 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.14 | 1.34 | -1.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.27 | 2.77 | -3.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLG vs. ASM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLG drawdown since its inception was -99.81%, which is greater than ASM's maximum drawdown of -94.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLG and ASM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLG | ASM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.81% | -94.10% | -5.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -62.07% | -52.40% | -9.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.07% | -52.40% | -9.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.19% | -63.94% | -10.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -97.73% | -90.91% | -6.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.71% | -47.69% | -52.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.84% | -63.74% | -5.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.35% | 25.37% | +6.98% |
Volatility
PLG vs. ASM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (PLG) is 24.75%, while Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) has a volatility of 27.33%. This indicates that PLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLG | ASM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.75% | 27.33% | -2.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.53% | 66.16% | -5.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 82.92% | 82.61% | +0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.19% | 66.18% | +6.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.29% | 69.80% | +10.49% |
Dividends
PLG vs. ASM - Dividend Comparison
Neither PLG nor ASM has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
PLG vs. ASM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Platinum Group Metals Ltd. and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PLG and ASM have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASM has higher volatility (27.33%) compared to PLG (24.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLG dropped -99.81% vs ASM's -94.10%.
ASM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLG and ASM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer