PLAB vs. TER

In the year-to-date period, PLAB achieves a -22.09% return, which is significantly lower than TER's -2.47% return. Over the past 10 years, PLAB has underperformed TER with an annualized return of 10.64%, while TER has yielded a comparatively higher 19.13% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Photronics, Inc. (PLAB) and Teradyne, Inc. (TER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current PLAB Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is comparable to the TER Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLAB and TER, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

PLAB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%.

The maximum PLAB drawdown since its inception was -99.22%, roughly equal to the maximum TER drawdown of -97.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLAB and TER. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Photronics, Inc. (PLAB) is 11.09%, while Teradyne, Inc. (TER) has a volatility of 14.49%. This indicates that PLAB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Photronics, Inc. and Teradyne, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.