PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PL=F vs. PPLT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


PL=FPPLT
YTD Return-3.53%-2.64%
1Y Return12.84%11.64%
3Y Return (Ann)-2.75%-3.55%
5Y Return (Ann)1.71%1.20%
10Y Return (Ann)-2.11%-2.74%
Sharpe Ratio0.150.43
Sortino Ratio0.410.79
Omega Ratio1.051.08
Calmar Ratio0.070.18
Martin Ratio0.421.19
Ulcer Index9.52%8.97%
Daily Std Dev26.09%24.63%
Max Drawdown-68.68%-70.73%
Current Drawdown-48.91%-53.07%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between PL=F and PPLT is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

PL=F vs. PPLT - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, PL=F achieves a -3.53% return, which is significantly lower than PPLT's -2.64% return. Over the past 10 years, PL=F has outperformed PPLT with an annualized return of -2.11%, while PPLT has yielded a comparatively lower -2.74% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-2.75%
-3.09%
PL=F
PPLT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PL=F vs. PPLT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Platinum (PL=F) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PL=F
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PL=F, currently valued at 0.15, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.502.000.15
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PL=F, currently valued at 0.41, compared to the broader market-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.500.41
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PL=F, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market1.001.101.201.301.401.05
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PL=F, currently valued at 0.07, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.000.07
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PL=F, currently valued at 0.42, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.42
PPLT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PPLT, currently valued at 0.12, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.502.000.12
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PPLT, currently valued at 0.35, compared to the broader market-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.500.35
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PPLT, currently valued at 1.04, compared to the broader market1.001.101.201.301.401.04
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PPLT, currently valued at 0.05, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.000.05
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PPLT, currently valued at 0.32, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.32

PL=F vs. PPLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PL=F Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the PPLT Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PL=F and PPLT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.40-0.200.000.200.400.600.80JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.15
0.12
PL=F
PPLT

Drawdowns

PL=F vs. PPLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PL=F drawdown since its inception was -68.68%, roughly equal to the maximum PPLT drawdown of -70.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PL=F and PPLT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-56.00%-54.00%-52.00%-50.00%-48.00%-46.00%-44.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-48.91%
-53.07%
PL=F
PPLT

Volatility

PL=F vs. PPLT - Volatility Comparison

Platinum (PL=F) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) have volatilities of 6.96% and 6.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.96%
6.98%
PL=F
PPLT