PL=F vs. PPLT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Platinum (PL=F) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT).

PPLT is a passively managed fund by Aberdeen that tracks the performance of the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt). It was launched on Jan 8, 2010.

Performance

PL=F vs. PPLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Platinum (PL=F) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PL=F vs. PPLT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PL=F Platinum	-3.38%	123.45%	-9.78%	-6.81%	12.08%	-10.47%	10.37%	22.13%	-14.68%	3.60%
PPLT Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF	-4.29%	124.48%	-8.90%	-8.18%	10.43%	-10.75%	10.78%	20.85%	-14.95%	2.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PL=F achieves a -3.38% return, which is significantly higher than PPLT's -4.29% return. Over the past 10 years, PL=F has outperformed PPLT with an annualized return of 7.48%, while PPLT has yielded a comparatively lower 6.82% annualized return.

PL=F

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -14.97%
• YTD: -3.38%
• 6M: 25.22%
• 1Y: 95.68%
• 3Y*: 25.14%
• 5Y*: 10.22%
• 10Y*: 7.48%

PPLT

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -14.94%
• YTD: -4.29%
• 6M: 25.60%
• 1Y: 98.09%
• 3Y*: 24.74%
• 5Y*: 9.46%
• 10Y*: 6.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PL=F vs. PPLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PL=F

PL=F Risk / Return Rank: 80
PL=F Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
PL=F Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
PL=F Omega Ratio Rank: 76
PL=F Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
PL=F Martin Ratio Rank: 65

PPLT

PPLT Risk / Return Rank: 84
PPLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
PPLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
PPLT Omega Ratio Rank: 85
PPLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
PPLT Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PL=F vs. PPLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Platinum (PL=F) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PL=F	PPLT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	2.01	-0.28
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	2.25	-0.23
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.35	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.11	2.77	+0.34
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.76	8.31	+0.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PL=F vs. PPLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PL=F Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the PPLT Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PL=F and PPLT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PL=F	PPLT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.73	2.01	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29	0.30	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24	0.24	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.11	0.03	+0.08

Correlation

The correlation between PL=F and PPLT is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Drawdowns

PL=F vs. PPLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PL=F drawdown since its inception was -68.68%, roughly equal to the maximum PPLT drawdown of -70.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PL=F and PPLT.

Drawdown Indicators

	PL=F	PPLT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.68%	-70.73%	+2.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.53%	-34.41%	-1.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.35%	-34.74%	-1.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.56%	-51.14%	+1.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.08%	-29.26%	-1.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.47%	-40.08%	+3.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.64%	11.47%	+1.17%

Volatility

PL=F vs. PPLT - Volatility Comparison

Platinum (PL=F) has a higher volatility of 14.64% compared to Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) at 13.24%. This indicates that PL=F's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PL=F	PPLT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.64%	13.24%	+1.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	49.49%	44.59%	+4.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	53.20%	49.12%	+4.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.24%	32.02%	+3.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.52%	28.72%	+2.80%