PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PL=F vs. GOLD.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


PL=FGOLD.TO
YTD Return-1.56%-8.46%
1Y Return14.00%11.21%
3Y Return (Ann)-2.07%-12.28%
5Y Return (Ann)2.12%3.77%
10Y Return (Ann)-1.91%7.14%
Sharpe Ratio0.240.30
Sortino Ratio0.520.72
Omega Ratio1.061.08
Calmar Ratio0.110.15
Martin Ratio0.640.76
Ulcer Index9.51%14.79%
Daily Std Dev26.02%37.22%
Max Drawdown-68.68%-76.83%
Current Drawdown-47.87%-68.60%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between PL=F and GOLD.TO is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

PL=F vs. GOLD.TO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, PL=F achieves a -1.56% return, which is significantly higher than GOLD.TO's -8.46% return. Over the past 10 years, PL=F has underperformed GOLD.TO with an annualized return of -1.91%, while GOLD.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 7.14% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.89%
2.98%
PL=F
GOLD.TO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PL=F vs. GOLD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Platinum (PL=F) and GoldMining Inc. (GOLD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PL=F
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PL=F, currently valued at 0.24, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.502.000.24
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PL=F, currently valued at 0.52, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.502.002.503.000.52
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PL=F, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market1.001.101.201.301.401.06
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PL=F, currently valued at 0.11, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.000.11
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PL=F, currently valued at 0.64, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.64
GOLD.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GOLD.TO, currently valued at -0.20, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.502.00-0.20
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GOLD.TO, currently valued at -0.04, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.502.002.503.00-0.04
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GOLD.TO, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market1.001.101.201.301.401.00
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GOLD.TO, currently valued at -0.10, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00-0.10
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GOLD.TO, currently valued at -0.46, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00-0.46

PL=F vs. GOLD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PL=F Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is comparable to the GOLD.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PL=F and GOLD.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.24
-0.20
PL=F
GOLD.TO

Drawdowns

PL=F vs. GOLD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PL=F drawdown since its inception was -68.68%, smaller than the maximum GOLD.TO drawdown of -76.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PL=F and GOLD.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-75.00%-70.00%-65.00%-60.00%-55.00%-50.00%-45.00%-40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-47.87%
-70.41%
PL=F
GOLD.TO

Volatility

PL=F vs. GOLD.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Platinum (PL=F) is 6.66%, while GoldMining Inc. (GOLD.TO) has a volatility of 8.81%. This indicates that PL=F experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOLD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.66%
8.81%
PL=F
GOLD.TO