PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PL=F vs. AUD=X
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PL=F vs. AUD=X - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Platinum (PL=F) and USD/AUD (AUD=X). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PL=F is traded in USD, while AUD=X is traded in AUD. To make them comparable, the AUD=X values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PL=F achieves a -8.48% return, which is significantly lower than AUD=X's -0.02% return. Over the past 10 years, PL=F has outperformed AUD=X with an annualized return of 6.61%, while AUD=X has yielded a comparatively lower 0.01% annualized return.


PL=F

1D
-3.13%
1M
-4.36%
YTD
-8.48%
6M
12.41%
1Y
73.81%
3Y*
22.88%
5Y*
9.84%
10Y*
6.61%

AUD=X

1D
-0.05%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
-0.02%
6M
-0.01%
1Y
0.04%
3Y*
-0.00%
5Y*
0.01%
10Y*
0.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PL=F vs. AUD=X - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PL=F
Platinum
-8.48%123.45%-9.78%-6.81%12.08%-10.47%10.37%22.13%-14.68%3.60%
AUD=X
USD/AUD
-0.02%-0.01%0.03%0.01%-0.08%-0.04%0.11%0.09%-0.05%0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between PL=F and AUD=X is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2009

0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PL=F vs. AUD=X — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PL=F
PL=F Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
PL=F Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PL=F Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
PL=F Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
PL=F Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
PL=F Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

AUD=X
AUD=X Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
AUD=X Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUD=X Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUD=X Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
AUD=X Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUD=X Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PL=F vs. AUD=X - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Platinum (PL=F) and USD/AUD (AUD=X). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PL=FAUD=XDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.31

0.02

+1.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.70

0.04

+1.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.01

+0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

0.04

+1.95

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.03

0.06

+3.97

PL=F vs. AUD=X - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PL=F Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the AUD=X Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PL=F and AUD=X, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PL=FAUD=XDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

0.02

+1.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.01

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

0.01

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.00

+0.09

Drawdowns

PL=F vs. AUD=X - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PL=F drawdown since its inception was -68.68%, which is greater than AUD=X's maximum drawdown of -3.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PL=F and AUD=X.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PL=FAUD=XDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.68%

-3.07%

-65.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.55%

-0.81%

-34.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.55%

-1.22%

-34.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.55%

-1.22%

-34.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.56%

-1.44%

-48.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.72%

-1.72%

-33.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.40%

-1.63%

-34.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.87%

0.11%

+17.76%

Volatility

PL=F vs. AUD=X - Volatility Comparison

Platinum (PL=F) has a higher volatility of 11.08% compared to USD/AUD (AUD=X) at 0.21%. This indicates that PL=F's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUD=X based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PL=FAUD=XDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.08%

0.21%

+10.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.91%

0.71%

+48.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.12%

1.44%

+52.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.61%

1.05%

+34.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.75%

1.33%

+30.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


PL=F and AUD=X have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PL=F has higher volatility (11.08%) compared to AUD=X (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PL=F dropped -68.68% vs AUD=X's -3.07%.

PL=F currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PL=F and AUD=X

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer