PortfoliosLab logo
PL=F vs. AUD=X
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between PL=F and AUD=X is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

PL=F vs. AUD=X - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Platinum (PL=F) and USD/AUD (AUD=X). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PL=F:

-0.10

AUD=X:

0.36

Sortino Ratio

PL=F:

0.04

AUD=X:

0.75

Omega Ratio

PL=F:

1.00

AUD=X:

1.09

Calmar Ratio

PL=F:

-0.05

AUD=X:

0.14

Martin Ratio

PL=F:

-0.27

AUD=X:

1.44

Ulcer Index

PL=F:

10.54%

AUD=X:

3.08%

Daily Std Dev

PL=F:

27.10%

AUD=X:

9.97%

Max Drawdown

PL=F:

-68.68%

AUD=X:

-56.54%

Current Drawdown

PL=F:

-48.63%

AUD=X:

-24.76%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PL=F achieves a 7.52% return, which is significantly higher than AUD=X's -2.86% return. Over the past 10 years, PL=F has underperformed AUD=X with an annualized return of -1.76%, while AUD=X has yielded a comparatively higher 2.27% annualized return.


PL=F

YTD

7.52%

1M

3.64%

6M

0.98%

1Y

-2.80%

5Y*

4.94%

10Y*

-1.76%

AUD=X

YTD

-2.86%

1M

-1.30%

6M

3.22%

1Y

3.64%

5Y*

0.26%

10Y*

2.27%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PL=F vs. AUD=X — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PL=F
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PL=F is 4646
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PL=F is 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PL=F is 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PL=F is 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PL=F is 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PL=F is 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

AUD=X
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AUD=X is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AUD=X is 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AUD=X is 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AUD=X is 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AUD=X is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AUD=X is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PL=F vs. AUD=X - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Platinum (PL=F) and USD/AUD (AUD=X). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PL=F Sharpe Ratio is -0.10, which is lower than the AUD=X Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PL=F and AUD=X, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Drawdowns

PL=F vs. AUD=X - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PL=F drawdown since its inception was -68.68%, which is greater than AUD=X's maximum drawdown of -56.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PL=F and AUD=X. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

PL=F vs. AUD=X - Volatility Comparison

Platinum (PL=F) has a higher volatility of 6.39% compared to USD/AUD (AUD=X) at 2.54%. This indicates that PL=F's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUD=X based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...