PKSFX vs. XMHQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core Fund (PKSFX) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ).
PKSFX is managed by Virtus. It was launched on Oct 18, 1996. XMHQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index. It was launched on Dec 1, 2006.
Performance
PKSFX vs. XMHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PKSFX vs. XMHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PKSFX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core Fund | 1.54% | -2.58% | 13.67% | 32.32% | -10.77% | 19.03% | 21.38% | 40.21% | -1.99% | 34.98% |
XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF | 2.09% | 4.71% | 16.79% | 29.51% | -12.42% | 20.98% | 26.61% | 27.18% | -9.08% | 15.64% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PKSFX achieves a 1.54% return, which is significantly lower than XMHQ's 2.09% return. Over the past 10 years, PKSFX has outperformed XMHQ with an annualized return of 14.98%, while XMHQ has yielded a comparatively lower 12.53% annualized return.
PKSFX
- 1D
- 2.07%
- 1M
- -6.10%
- YTD
- 1.54%
- 6M
- 1.60%
- 1Y
- 3.79%
- 3Y*
- 10.39%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 14.98%
XMHQ
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- -4.01%
- YTD
- 2.09%
- 6M
- -0.40%
- 1Y
- 13.46%
- 3Y*
- 14.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.29%
- 10Y*
- 12.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PKSFX vs. XMHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PKSFX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than XMHQ's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PKSFX vs. XMHQ — Risk / Return Rank
PKSFX
XMHQ
PKSFX vs. XMHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core Fund (PKSFX) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PKSFX | XMHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.23 | 0.67 | -0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.48 | 1.13 | -0.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.14 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.42 | 1.18 | -0.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.95 | 4.29 | -3.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PKSFX | XMHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 | 0.67 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.40 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | 0.61 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.44 | +0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between PKSFX and XMHQ is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PKSFX vs. XMHQ - Dividend Comparison
PKSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.08%, more than XMHQ's 0.59% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PKSFX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core Fund | 14.08% | 14.30% | 4.07% | 4.12% | 6.65% | 12.05% | 7.45% | 4.03% | 4.33% | 0.17% | 5.69% | 19.83% |
XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF | 0.59% | 0.64% | 5.20% | 0.73% | 1.72% | 1.00% | 1.12% | 1.22% | 1.59% | 1.06% | 1.63% | 1.34% |
Drawdowns
PKSFX vs. XMHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PKSFX drawdown since its inception was -54.46%, smaller than the maximum XMHQ drawdown of -58.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKSFX and XMHQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PKSFX | XMHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.46% | -58.19% | +3.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.21% | -12.54% | +1.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.02% | -25.47% | +3.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.45% | -36.90% | +3.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.42% | -4.40% | -5.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.17% | -9.35% | +2.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.96% | 3.44% | +1.52% |
Volatility
PKSFX vs. XMHQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core Fund (PKSFX) is 4.62%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) has a volatility of 5.99%. This indicates that PKSFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PKSFX | XMHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.62% | 5.99% | -1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.11% | 11.42% | -0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.95% | 20.29% | -1.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.90% | 20.76% | -2.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.79% | 20.69% | -1.90% |