PKSFX vs. XMHQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core Fund (PKSFX) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ).
PKSFX is managed by Virtus. It was launched on Oct 18, 1996. XMHQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index. It was launched on Dec 1, 2006.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PKSFX or XMHQ.
Key characteristics
PKSFX | XMHQ | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 15.10% | 21.18% |
1Y Return | 29.94% | 33.34% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 13.80% | 13.52% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 15.48% | 17.78% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 16.68% | 12.32% |
Sharpe Ratio | 1.81 | 1.73 |
Daily Std Dev | 16.36% | 18.70% |
Max Drawdown | -66.37% | -58.19% |
Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -2.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between PKSFX and XMHQ is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
PKSFX vs. XMHQ - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, PKSFX achieves a 15.10% return, which is significantly lower than XMHQ's 21.18% return. Over the past 10 years, PKSFX has outperformed XMHQ with an annualized return of 16.68%, while XMHQ has yielded a comparatively lower 12.32% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PKSFX vs. XMHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PKSFX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than XMHQ's 0.25% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PKSFX vs. XMHQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core Fund (PKSFX) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PKSFX vs. XMHQ - Dividend Comparison
PKSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, less than XMHQ's 4.82% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core Fund | 3.58% | 4.12% | 6.65% | 12.05% | 7.45% | 4.03% | 4.33% | 0.17% | 5.69% | 19.83% | 6.41% | 0.18% |
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF | 4.82% | 0.73% | 1.72% | 1.00% | 1.12% | 1.22% | 1.59% | 1.06% | 1.63% | 1.34% | 1.25% | 1.11% |
Drawdowns
PKSFX vs. XMHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PKSFX drawdown since its inception was -66.37%, which is greater than XMHQ's maximum drawdown of -58.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKSFX and XMHQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PKSFX vs. XMHQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core Fund (PKSFX) is 4.85%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) has a volatility of 5.92%. This indicates that PKSFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.