PKOH vs. ET

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. (PKOH) and Energy Transfer LP (ET).

Performance

PKOH vs. ET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. (PKOH) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PKOH vs. ET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PKOH Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.	15.86%	-18.27%	-0.78%	127.07%	-40.25%	-30.26%	-7.34%	11.39%	-32.36%	9.23%
ET Energy Transfer LP	17.51%	-9.37%	53.87%	27.87%	55.74%	42.96%	-44.92%	5.88%	-17.74%	-4.66%

Fundamentals

Market Cap PKOH : $337.96M ET : $69.42B
EPS PKOH : $0.73 ET : $1.37
PE Ratio PKOH : 33.05 ET : 13.90
PS Ratio PKOH : 0.21 ET : 0.82
PB Ratio PKOH : 0.88 ET : 1.42
Total Revenue (TTM) PKOH : $1.60B ET : $82.63B
Gross Profit (TTM) PKOH : $407.30M ET : $18.01B
EBITDA (TTM) PKOH : $161.70M ET : $14.93B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PKOH achieves a 15.86% return, which is significantly lower than ET's 17.51% return. Over the past 10 years, PKOH has underperformed ET with an annualized return of -3.72%, while ET has yielded a comparatively higher 20.33% annualized return.

PKOH

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: -8.84%
• YTD: 15.86%
• 6M: 14.24%
• 1Y: 13.70%
• 3Y*: 28.90%
• 5Y*: -3.82%
• 10Y*: -3.72%

ET

• 1D: -1.45%
• 1M: -0.42%
• YTD: 17.51%
• 6M: 16.34%
• 1Y: 9.61%
• 3Y*: 24.91%
• 5Y*: 29.13%
• 10Y*: 20.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PKOH vs. ET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PKOH

PKOH Risk / Return Rank: 50
PKOH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
PKOH Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
PKOH Omega Ratio Rank: 46
PKOH Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
PKOH Martin Ratio Rank: 53

ET

ET Risk / Return Rank: 53
ET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
ET Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
ET Omega Ratio Rank: 48
ET Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
ET Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PKOH vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. (PKOH) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PKOH	ET	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.31	0.41	-0.10
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.75	0.72	+0.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.10	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.51	0.60	-0.09
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.16	1.67	-0.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PKOH vs. ET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PKOH Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is comparable to the ET Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PKOH and ET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PKOH	ET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31	0.41	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.07	1.15	-1.22
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.07	0.56	-0.63
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.07	0.35	-0.28

Correlation

The correlation between PKOH and ET is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PKOH vs. ET - Dividend Comparison

PKOH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, less than ET's 6.97% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PKOH Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.	2.07%	2.39%	1.90%	1.85%	4.09%	2.36%	0.81%	1.49%	1.63%	1.09%	1.17%	1.36%
ET Energy Transfer LP	6.97%	7.97%	6.51%	8.95%	7.33%	7.41%	17.27%	9.51%	9.24%	6.66%	5.90%	7.42%

Drawdowns

PKOH vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PKOH drawdown since its inception was -94.23%, which is greater than ET's maximum drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKOH and ET.

Drawdown Indicators

	PKOH	ET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.23%	-87.81%	-6.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.61%	-17.33%	-11.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-74.28%	-25.82%	-48.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-78.55%	-72.82%	-5.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-54.12%	-3.30%	-50.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.47%	-25.95%	-18.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.62%	6.24%	+6.38%

Volatility

PKOH vs. ET - Volatility Comparison

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. (PKOH) has a higher volatility of 12.76% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 5.02%. This indicates that PKOH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PKOH	ET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.76%	5.02%	+7.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.71%	11.78%	+16.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.99%	23.83%	+21.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.24%	25.47%	+25.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.75%	36.63%	+16.12%

Financials

PKOH vs. ET - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. and Energy Transfer LP over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

PKOH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. reported a gross profit of 204.40M and revenue of 395.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.8%.

ET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 5.78B and revenue of 22.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.8%.

PKOH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. reported an operating income of 10.00M and revenue of 395.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.5%.

ET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.37B and revenue of 22.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.6%.

PKOH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. reported a net income of -12.80M and revenue of 395.00M, resulting in a net margin of -3.2%.

ET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.46B and revenue of 22.41B, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.