PKOH vs. ET
Compare and contrast key facts about Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. (PKOH) and Energy Transfer LP (ET).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PKOH or ET.
Correlation
The correlation between PKOH and ET is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
PKOH vs. ET - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
PKOH:
0.20
ET:
2.74
PKOH:
0.59
ET:
3.60
PKOH:
1.07
ET:
1.49
PKOH:
0.14
ET:
3.17
PKOH:
0.72
ET:
23.16
PKOH:
11.42%
ET:
2.31%
PKOH:
40.41%
ET:
19.53%
PKOH:
-94.23%
ET:
-87.81%
PKOH:
-51.91%
ET:
-4.50%
Fundamentals
PKOH:
$364.39M
ET:
$67.83B
PKOH:
$3.34
ET:
$1.28
PKOH:
7.77
ET:
15.48
PKOH:
1.09
ET:
0.69
PKOH:
$1.27B
ET:
$63.13B
PKOH:
$216.90M
ET:
$9.12B
PKOH:
$100.00M
ET:
$11.50B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PKOH achieves a -0.73% return, which is significantly lower than ET's 2.76% return. Over the past 10 years, PKOH has underperformed ET with an annualized return of -5.85%, while ET has yielded a comparatively higher 4.23% annualized return.
PKOH
-0.73%
10.55%
-5.94%
7.42%
-0.92%
-5.85%
ET
2.76%
3.66%
31.65%
51.47%
19.48%
4.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PKOH vs. ET — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
PKOH
ET
PKOH vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. (PKOH) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PKOH vs. ET - Dividend Comparison
PKOH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, less than ET's 6.49% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PKOH Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. | 1.93% | 1.90% | 1.85% | 4.09% | 2.36% | 0.81% | 1.49% | 1.63% | 1.09% | 1.17% | 1.36% | 0.59% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 6.49% | 6.51% | 8.96% | 7.33% | 7.44% | 17.28% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% | 2.61% |
Drawdowns
PKOH vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PKOH drawdown since its inception was -94.23%, which is greater than ET's maximum drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKOH and ET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PKOH vs. ET - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. (PKOH) is 8.41%, while Energy Transfer LP (ET) has a volatility of 9.45%. This indicates that PKOH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
PKOH vs. ET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities