PortfoliosLab logo
PKOH vs. ET
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between PKOH and ET is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

PKOH vs. ET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. (PKOH) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PKOH:

-0.67

ET:

0.77

Sortino Ratio

PKOH:

-0.84

ET:

1.21

Omega Ratio

PKOH:

0.90

ET:

1.17

Calmar Ratio

PKOH:

-0.43

ET:

0.88

Martin Ratio

PKOH:

-1.26

ET:

2.70

Ulcer Index

PKOH:

22.60%

ET:

7.97%

Daily Std Dev

PKOH:

42.23%

ET:

27.54%

Max Drawdown

PKOH:

-94.23%

ET:

-87.81%

Current Drawdown

PKOH:

-65.87%

ET:

-14.11%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PKOH:

$260.40M

ET:

$60.67B

EPS

PKOH:

$2.97

ET:

$1.31

PE Ratio

PKOH:

6.16

ET:

13.34

PEG Ratio

PKOH:

1.09

ET:

0.82

PS Ratio

PKOH:

0.16

ET:

0.74

PB Ratio

PKOH:

0.75

ET:

1.72

Total Revenue (TTM)

PKOH:

$1.64B

ET:

$82.06B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PKOH:

$278.10M

ET:

$15.84B

EBITDA (TTM)

PKOH:

$120.70M

ET:

$15.57B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PKOH achieves a -29.56% return, which is significantly lower than ET's -7.58% return. Over the past 10 years, PKOH has underperformed ET with an annualized return of -7.57%, while ET has yielded a comparatively higher 1.71% annualized return.


PKOH

YTD

-29.56%

1M

-8.89%

6M

-42.48%

1Y

-28.67%

3Y*

8.15%

5Y*

7.07%

10Y*

-7.57%

ET

YTD

-7.58%

1M

7.78%

6M

-8.84%

1Y

20.09%

3Y*

24.55%

5Y*

26.96%

10Y*

1.71%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.

Energy Transfer LP

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PKOH vs. ET — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PKOH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PKOH is 1717
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PKOH is 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PKOH is 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PKOH is 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PKOH is 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PKOH is 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

ET
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ET is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ET is 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ET is 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ET is 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ET is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ET is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PKOH vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. (PKOH) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PKOH Sharpe Ratio is -0.67, which is lower than the ET Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PKOH and ET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

PKOH vs. ET - Dividend Comparison

PKOH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, less than ET's 7.41% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PKOH
Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.
2.73%1.90%1.85%4.09%2.36%0.81%1.49%1.63%1.09%1.17%1.36%0.59%
ET
Energy Transfer LP
7.41%6.51%8.96%7.33%7.44%17.28%9.51%9.24%6.66%5.90%7.42%2.61%

Drawdowns

PKOH vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PKOH drawdown since its inception was -94.23%, which is greater than ET's maximum drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKOH and ET.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

PKOH vs. ET - Volatility Comparison

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. (PKOH) has a higher volatility of 11.50% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 9.56%. This indicates that PKOH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

PKOH vs. ET - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20212022202320242025
405.40M
21.02B
(PKOH) Total Revenue
(ET) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PKOH vs. ET - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. and Energy Transfer LP over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%20212022202320242025
16.8%
19.4%
(PKOH) Gross Margin
(ET) Gross Margin
PKOH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. reported a gross profit of 68.10M and revenue of 405.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.8%.

ET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 4.08B and revenue of 21.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.4%.

PKOH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. reported an operating income of 18.90M and revenue of 405.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.7%.

ET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.49B and revenue of 21.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.

PKOH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. reported a net income of 8.30M and revenue of 405.40M, resulting in a net margin of 2.1%.

ET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.32B and revenue of 21.02B, resulting in a net margin of 6.3%.