PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PKG vs. HUBB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PKG vs. HUBB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Packaging Corporation of America (PKG) and Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PKG achieves a 14.31% return, which is significantly lower than HUBB's 15.49% return. Over the past 10 years, PKG has underperformed HUBB with an annualized return of 16.77%, while HUBB has yielded a comparatively higher 20.03% annualized return.


PKG

1D
-0.51%
1M
8.55%
YTD
14.31%
6M
13.98%
1Y
26.43%
3Y*
25.03%
5Y*
15.06%
10Y*
16.77%

HUBB

1D
-5.46%
1M
7.68%
YTD
15.49%
6M
12.49%
1Y
30.76%
3Y*
18.69%
5Y*
24.52%
10Y*
20.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PKG vs. HUBB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PKG
Packaging Corporation of America
14.31%-6.08%41.70%31.90%-2.62%1.55%27.20%38.35%-28.85%45.51%
HUBB
Hubbell Incorporated
15.49%7.43%28.94%42.40%15.08%35.60%8.89%52.88%-24.61%18.83%

Correlation

The correlation between PKG and HUBB is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2015

0.48

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PKG:

$20.75B

HUBB:

$27.19B

EPS

PKG:

$8.25

HUBB:

$16.89

PE Ratio

PKG:

28.21

HUBB:

30.19

PEG Ratio

PKG:

37.17

HUBB:

1.26

PS Ratio

PKG:

2.27

HUBB:

4.56

PB Ratio

PKG:

4.52

HUBB:

7.19

Total Revenue (TTM)

PKG:

$9.22B

HUBB:

$6.00B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PKG:

$1.89B

HUBB:

$2.13B

EBITDA (TTM)

PKG:

$1.84B

HUBB:

$1.44B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PKG vs. HUBB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PKG
PKG Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PKG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PKG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
PKG Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
PKG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
PKG Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

HUBB
HUBB Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
HUBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUBB Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
HUBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUBB Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PKG vs. HUBB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Packaging Corporation of America (PKG) and Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PKGHUBBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.19

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

1.78

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.37

4.61

-1.24

PKG vs. HUBB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PKG Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is comparable to the HUBB Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PKG and HUBB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PKG vs. HUBB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PKG drawdown since its inception was -66.88%, which is greater than HUBB's maximum drawdown of -41.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKG and HUBB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PKGHUBBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.88%

-41.63%

-25.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.21%

-17.36%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.43%

-32.65%

+4.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.78%

-32.65%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.18%

-41.63%

+3.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.29%

-8.31%

+4.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.71%

-7.43%

-4.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.87%

6.70%

+1.17%

Volatility

PKG vs. HUBB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Packaging Corporation of America (PKG) is 8.14%, while Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) has a volatility of 11.17%. This indicates that PKG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HUBB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PKGHUBBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.14%

11.17%

-3.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.72%

23.30%

-2.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.75%

29.62%

-1.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.47%

29.39%

-3.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.36%

28.90%

-1.54%

Dividends

PKG vs. HUBB - Dividend Comparison

PKG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, more than HUBB's 1.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HUBB
Hubbell Incorporated
1.09%1.21%1.19%1.39%1.82%1.92%2.37%2.32%3.17%2.12%2.22%0.00%
PKG
Packaging Corporation of America
2.25%2.42%2.22%3.07%3.71%2.94%2.44%2.82%3.59%2.09%2.78%3.49%

Financials

PKG vs. HUBB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Packaging Corporation of America and Hubbell Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
2.37B
1.52B
(PKG) Total Revenue
(HUBB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PKG vs. HUBB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Packaging Corporation of America and Hubbell Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%20222023202420252026
19.1%
33.3%
Portfolio components
PKG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Packaging Corporation of America reported a gross profit of 452.90M and revenue of 2.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.1%.

HUBB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hubbell Incorporated reported a gross profit of 505.30M and revenue of 1.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.3%.

PKG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Packaging Corporation of America reported an operating income of 272.60M and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.

HUBB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hubbell Incorporated reported an operating income of 263.80M and revenue of 1.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.4%.

PKG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Packaging Corporation of America reported a net income of 170.90M and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in a net margin of 7.2%.

HUBB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hubbell Incorporated reported a net income of 181.80M and revenue of 1.52B, resulting in a net margin of 12.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PKG and HUBB have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HUBB has higher volatility (11.17%) compared to PKG (8.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PKG dropped -66.88% vs HUBB's -41.63%.

HUBB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PKG and HUBB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer