PK vs. WH
PK (Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.) and WH (Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.) are both stocks. PK operates in REIT - Hotel & Motel (Real Estate), while WH operates in Lodging (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, PK returned -1.04%/yr vs 3.59%/yr for WH. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
PK vs. WH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PK achieves a 30.72% return, which is significantly higher than WH's 8.42% return.
PK
- 1D
- 3.49%
- 1M
- 17.62%
- YTD
- 30.72%
- 6M
- 32.42%
- 1Y
- 44.39%
- 3Y*
- 10.87%
- 5Y*
- -1.04%
- 10Y*
- —
WH
- 1D
- 2.98%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- YTD
- 8.42%
- 6M
- 12.78%
- 1Y
- 0.58%
- 3Y*
- 6.26%
- 5Y*
- 3.59%
- 10Y*
- —
PK vs. WH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PK Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. | 30.72% | -18.45% | 0.98% | 49.45% | -36.03% | 10.09% | -30.13% | 6.86% | -10.45% |
WH Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. | 8.42% | -23.54% | 27.70% | 14.94% | -19.06% | 52.60% | -4.15% | 41.40% | -25.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between PK and WH is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2018 | 0.61 |
The correlation between PK and WH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
PK:
$2.67B
WH:
$6.18B
PK:
-$1.08
WH:
$2.52
PK:
1.05
WH:
4.33
PK:
0.86
WH:
13.82
PK:
$2.53B
WH:
$1.44B
PK:
-$119.00M
WH:
$965.00M
PK:
$291.00M
WH:
$483.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PK vs. WH — Risk / Return Rank
PK
WH
PK vs. WH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK) and Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PK | WH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.39 | 0.02 | +1.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.21 | 0.25 | +1.95 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.03 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | 0.02 | +2.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.18 | 0.04 | +6.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PK | WH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 0.02 | +1.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | 0.12 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.15 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
PK vs. WH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PK drawdown since its inception was -84.22%, which is greater than WH's maximum drawdown of -66.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PK and WH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PK | WH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.22% | -66.07% | -18.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.08% | -24.30% | +7.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.83% | -37.17% | -7.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.83% | -37.17% | -12.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.33% | -25.33% | -9.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.08% | -16.54% | -17.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.71% | 12.47% | -5.76% |
Volatility
PK vs. WH - Volatility Comparison
Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK) has a higher volatility of 10.72% compared to Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH) at 9.56%. This indicates that PK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PK | WH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.72% | 9.56% | +1.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.67% | 21.57% | +1.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.20% | 29.52% | +2.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.62% | 29.50% | +8.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.11% | 35.82% | +10.29% |
Dividends
PK vs. WH - Dividend Comparison
PK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.49%, more than WH's 2.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PK Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. | 7.49% | 9.56% | 9.95% | 14.05% | 2.37% | 0.00% | 2.62% | 7.34% | 12.86% | 16.10% |
WH Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. | 2.04% | 2.17% | 1.51% | 1.74% | 1.79% | 0.98% | 0.94% | 1.85% | 1.65% | 0.00% |
Financials
PK vs. WH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. and Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PK vs. WH - Profitability Comparison
PK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 622.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
WH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. reported a gross profit of 302.00M and revenue of 327.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 92.4%.
PK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. reported an operating income of 62.00M and revenue of 622.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.
WH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. reported an operating income of 114.00M and revenue of 327.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 34.9%.
PK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. reported a net income of 11.00M and revenue of 622.00M, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.
WH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. reported a net income of 61.00M and revenue of 327.00M, resulting in a net margin of 18.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PK and WH have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PK has higher volatility (10.72%) compared to WH (9.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PK dropped -84.22% vs WH's -66.07%.
PK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PK and WH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer