PK vs. WH
PK (Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.) and WH (Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.) are both stocks. PK operates in REIT - Hotel & Motel (Real Estate), while WH operates in Lodging (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, PK returned -0.55%/yr vs 4.86%/yr for WH. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
PK vs. WH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PK achieves a 41.30% return, which is significantly higher than WH's 13.26% return.
PK
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- 25.37%
- YTD
- 41.30%
- 6M
- 41.53%
- 1Y
- 54.25%
- 3Y*
- 18.03%
- 5Y*
- -0.55%
- 10Y*
- —
WH
- 1D
- 3.21%
- 1M
- 7.54%
- YTD
- 13.26%
- 6M
- 11.38%
- 1Y
- 9.15%
- 3Y*
- 10.54%
- 5Y*
- 4.86%
- 10Y*
- —
PK vs. WH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PK Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. | 41.30% | -18.45% | 0.98% | 49.45% | -36.03% | 10.09% | -30.13% | 6.86% | -8.98% |
WH Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. | 13.26% | -23.54% | 27.70% | 14.94% | -19.06% | 52.60% | -4.15% | 41.40% | -29.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between PK and WH is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2018 | 0.61 |
The correlation between PK and WH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
PK:
$2.89B
WH:
$6.42B
PK:
-$1.08
WH:
$2.52
PK:
1.14
WH:
4.50
PK:
0.93
WH:
14.35
PK:
$2.53B
WH:
$1.44B
PK:
-$119.00M
WH:
$965.00M
PK:
$291.00M
WH:
$483.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PK vs. WH — Risk / Return Rank
PK
WH
PK vs. WH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK) and Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PK | WH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.07 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.19 | 0.38 | +2.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.15 | 0.72 | +7.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PK vs. WH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PK drawdown since its inception was -84.22%, which is greater than WH's maximum drawdown of -66.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PK and WH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PK | WH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.22% | -66.07% | -18.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.08% | -24.30% | +7.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.83% | -37.17% | -7.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.41% | -37.17% | -11.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.01% | -22.01% | -7.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.05% | -16.61% | -17.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.67% | 12.69% | -6.02% |
Volatility
PK vs. WH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK) is 9.34%, while Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH) has a volatility of 12.36%. This indicates that PK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PK | WH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.34% | 12.36% | -3.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.49% | 23.19% | -0.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.68% | 30.77% | +0.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.49% | 29.82% | +7.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.01% | 35.92% | +10.09% |
Dividends
PK vs. WH - Dividend Comparison
PK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.93%, more than WH's 1.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PK Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. | 6.93% | 9.56% | 9.95% | 14.05% | 2.37% | 0.00% | 2.62% | 7.34% | 12.86% | 16.10% |
WH Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. | 1.98% | 2.17% | 1.51% | 1.74% | 1.79% | 0.98% | 0.94% | 1.85% | 1.65% | 0.00% |
Financials
PK vs. WH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. and Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PK vs. WH - Profitability Comparison
PK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 622.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
WH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. reported a gross profit of 302.00M and revenue of 327.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 92.4%.
PK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. reported an operating income of 62.00M and revenue of 622.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.
WH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. reported an operating income of 114.00M and revenue of 327.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 34.9%.
PK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. reported a net income of 11.00M and revenue of 622.00M, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.
WH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. reported a net income of 61.00M and revenue of 327.00M, resulting in a net margin of 18.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PK and WH have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WH has higher volatility (12.36%) compared to PK (9.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PK dropped -84.22% vs WH's -66.07%.
PK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PK and WH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer