PK vs. SPG
PK (Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.) and SPG (Simon Property Group, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Real Estate sector — PK in REIT - Hotel & Motel, SPG in REIT - Retail. Over the past 5 years, PK returned -1.04%/yr vs 14.65%/yr for SPG. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
PK vs. SPG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PK achieves a 30.72% return, which is significantly higher than SPG's 11.22% return.
PK
- 1D
- 3.49%
- 1M
- 17.62%
- YTD
- 30.72%
- 6M
- 32.42%
- 1Y
- 44.39%
- 3Y*
- 10.87%
- 5Y*
- -1.04%
- 10Y*
- —
SPG
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 11.22%
- 6M
- 14.40%
- 1Y
- 31.15%
- 3Y*
- 30.83%
- 5Y*
- 14.65%
- 10Y*
- 5.39%
PK vs. SPG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PK Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. | 30.72% | -18.45% | 0.98% | 49.45% | -36.03% | 10.09% | -30.13% | 6.86% | 1.69% | 13.76% |
SPG Simon Property Group, Inc. | 11.22% | 12.94% | 26.92% | 29.24% | -21.91% | 95.72% | -38.64% | -6.74% | 2.55% | -2.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between PK and SPG is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2017 | 0.57 |
The correlation between PK and SPG shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PK:
-$1.08
SPG:
$17.14
PK:
1.05
SPG:
7.50
PK:
$2.53B
SPG:
$6.65B
PK:
-$119.00M
SPG:
$5.71B
PK:
$291.00M
SPG:
$7.77B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PK vs. SPG — Risk / Return Rank
PK
SPG
PK vs. SPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK) and Simon Property Group, Inc. (SPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PK | SPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.39 | 1.71 | -0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.21 | 2.50 | -0.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.30 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | 2.69 | -0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.18 | 9.70 | -3.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PK | SPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 1.71 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | 0.56 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.38 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
PK vs. SPG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PK drawdown since its inception was -84.22%, which is greater than SPG's maximum drawdown of -77.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PK and SPG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PK | SPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.22% | -77.00% | -7.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.08% | -11.54% | -5.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.83% | -24.32% | -20.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.83% | -45.84% | -3.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -77.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.33% | -1.94% | -32.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.08% | -13.85% | -20.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.71% | 3.20% | +3.51% |
Volatility
PK vs. SPG - Volatility Comparison
Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK) has a higher volatility of 10.72% compared to Simon Property Group, Inc. (SPG) at 5.48%. This indicates that PK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PK | SPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.72% | 5.48% | +5.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.67% | 13.63% | +9.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.20% | 18.25% | +13.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.62% | 26.50% | +11.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.11% | 37.07% | +9.04% |
Dividends
PK vs. SPG - Dividend Comparison
PK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.49%, more than SPG's 4.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PK Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. | 7.49% | 9.56% | 9.95% | 14.05% | 2.37% | 0.00% | 2.62% | 7.34% | 12.86% | 16.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPG Simon Property Group, Inc. | 4.25% | 4.62% | 4.70% | 5.22% | 5.87% | 3.66% | 7.04% | 5.57% | 4.70% | 4.16% | 3.66% | 3.11% |
Financials
PK vs. SPG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. and Simon Property Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PK vs. SPG - Profitability Comparison
PK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 622.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
SPG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Simon Property Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.45B and revenue of 1.76B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.5%.
PK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. reported an operating income of 62.00M and revenue of 622.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.
SPG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Simon Property Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 762.16M and revenue of 1.76B, resulting in an operating margin of 43.4%.
PK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. reported a net income of 11.00M and revenue of 622.00M, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.
SPG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Simon Property Group, Inc. reported a net income of 1.48K and revenue of 1.76B, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PK and SPG have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PK has higher volatility (10.72%) compared to SPG (5.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PK dropped -84.22% vs SPG's -77.00%.
SPG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PK and SPG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer