PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PK vs. APLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PK vs. APLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK) and Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. (APLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PK having a 30.72% return and APLE slightly lower at 30.11%.


PK

1D
3.49%
1M
17.62%
YTD
30.72%
6M
32.42%
1Y
44.39%
3Y*
10.87%
5Y*
-1.04%
10Y*

APLE

1D
1.98%
1M
12.17%
YTD
30.11%
6M
31.77%
1Y
38.67%
3Y*
6.38%
5Y*
4.51%
10Y*
3.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PK vs. APLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PK
Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.
30.72%-18.45%0.98%49.45%-36.03%10.09%-30.13%6.86%1.69%13.76%
APLE
Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.
30.11%-16.61%-1.26%12.31%2.41%25.42%-18.91%21.97%-21.64%2.05%

Correlation

The correlation between PK and APLE is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2017

0.78

The correlation between PK and APLE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PK:

$2.67B

APLE:

$3.53B

EPS

PK:

-$1.08

APLE:

$0.72

PS Ratio

PK:

1.05

APLE:

2.49

PB Ratio

PK:

0.86

APLE:

1.13

Total Revenue (TTM)

PK:

$2.53B

APLE:

$1.42B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PK:

-$119.00M

APLE:

$673.26M

EBITDA (TTM)

PK:

$291.00M

APLE:

$388.53M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PK vs. APLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PK
PK Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
PK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
PK Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
PK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
PK Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

APLE
APLE Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
APLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
APLE Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
APLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
APLE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PK vs. APLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK) and Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. (APLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PKAPLEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.39

1.71

-0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.21

2.60

-0.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.28

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

2.92

-0.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.18

6.76

-0.58

PK vs. APLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PK Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the APLE Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PK and APLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PKAPLEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

1.71

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

0.17

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

0.12

-0.12

Drawdowns

PK vs. APLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PK drawdown since its inception was -84.22%, which is greater than APLE's maximum drawdown of -71.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PK and APLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PKAPLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.22%

-71.83%

-12.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.08%

-13.49%

-3.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.83%

-32.95%

-11.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.83%

-32.95%

-16.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.33%

0.00%

-34.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.08%

-12.41%

-21.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.71%

5.83%

+0.88%

Volatility

PK vs. APLE - Volatility Comparison

Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK) has a higher volatility of 10.72% compared to Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. (APLE) at 8.35%. This indicates that PK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PKAPLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.72%

8.35%

+2.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.67%

16.51%

+6.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.20%

22.70%

+9.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.62%

27.23%

+10.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.11%

34.54%

+11.57%

Dividends

PK vs. APLE - Dividend Comparison

PK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.49%, more than APLE's 6.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APLE
Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.
6.43%8.10%6.58%6.08%4.82%0.25%2.32%6.77%9.12%5.61%6.01%4.01%
PK
Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.
7.49%9.56%9.95%14.05%2.37%0.00%2.62%7.34%12.86%16.10%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PK vs. APLE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. and Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M20222023202420252026
622.00M
337.74M
(PK) Total Revenue
(APLE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PK vs. APLE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. and Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%202220232024202520260
73.8%
Portfolio components
PK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 622.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

APLE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. reported a gross profit of 249.08M and revenue of 337.74M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.8%.

PK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. reported an operating income of 62.00M and revenue of 622.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.

APLE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. reported an operating income of 48.01M and revenue of 337.74M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.2%.

PK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. reported a net income of 11.00M and revenue of 622.00M, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.

APLE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. reported a net income of 27.70M and revenue of 337.74M, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PK and APLE have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PK has higher volatility (10.72%) compared to APLE (8.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PK dropped -84.22% vs APLE's -71.83%.

APLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PK and APLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer