PK vs. AGNC

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK) and AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC).

Performance

PK vs. AGNC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK) and AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PK vs. AGNC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PK Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.	1.64%	-18.45%	0.98%	49.45%	-36.03%	10.09%	-30.13%	6.86%	1.69%	13.76%
AGNC AGNC Investment Corp.	-3.40%	34.92%	8.90%	10.14%	-21.65%	5.20%	-1.78%	13.31%	-2.46%	18.69%

Fundamentals

Market Cap PK : $2.07B AGNC : $10.97B
EPS PK : -$1.42 AGNC : $1.58
PS Ratio PK : 0.81 AGNC : 5.51
PB Ratio PK : 0.66 AGNC : 1.05
Total Revenue (TTM) PK : $2.54B AGNC : $1.92B
Gross Profit (TTM) PK : $50.00M AGNC : $1.92B
EBITDA (TTM) PK : $333.00M AGNC : $4.52B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PK achieves a 1.64% return, which is significantly higher than AGNC's -3.40% return.

PK

• 1D: -1.42%
• 1M: -5.41%
• YTD: 1.64%
• 6M: -1.33%
• 1Y: 6.00%
• 3Y*: 5.61%
• 5Y*: -7.09%
• 10Y*: —

AGNC

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: -9.03%
• YTD: -3.40%
• 6M: 7.97%
• 1Y: 21.99%
• 3Y*: 15.79%
• 5Y*: 2.93%
• 10Y*: 6.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PK vs. AGNC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PK

PK Risk / Return Rank: 46
PK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
PK Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
PK Omega Ratio Rank: 40
PK Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
PK Martin Ratio Rank: 51

AGNC

AGNC Risk / Return Rank: 67
AGNC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
AGNC Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
AGNC Omega Ratio Rank: 65
AGNC Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
AGNC Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PK vs. AGNC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK) and AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PK	AGNC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.16	0.97	-0.80
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.54	1.34	-0.80
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.19	-0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.36	1.11	-0.75
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.87	3.75	-2.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PK vs. AGNC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PK Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the AGNC Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PK and AGNC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PK	AGNC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16	0.97	-0.80
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.19	0.11	-0.30
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.25	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.06	0.42	-0.48

Correlation

The correlation between PK and AGNC is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

PK vs. AGNC - Dividend Comparison

PK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.63%, less than AGNC's 14.37% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PK Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.	9.63%	9.56%	9.95%	14.05%	2.37%	0.00%	2.62%	7.34%	12.86%	16.10%	0.00%	0.00%
AGNC AGNC Investment Corp.	14.37%	13.43%	15.64%	14.68%	13.91%	9.57%	10.00%	11.31%	12.31%	10.70%	12.69%	14.30%

Drawdowns

PK vs. AGNC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PK drawdown since its inception was -84.22%, which is greater than AGNC's maximum drawdown of -54.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PK and AGNC.

Drawdown Indicators

	PK	AGNC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.22%	-54.56%	-29.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.58%	-18.71%	+0.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-51.30%	-54.56%	+3.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-54.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.94%	-14.91%	-34.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.90%	-13.60%	-20.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.72%	5.55%	+2.17%

Volatility

PK vs. AGNC - Volatility Comparison

Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK) and AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) have volatilities of 9.20% and 9.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PK	AGNC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.20%	9.58%	-0.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.40%	15.07%	+7.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.99%	22.88%	+14.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.54%	25.71%	+11.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.29%	25.31%	+20.98%

Financials