PJFAX vs. FBGRX

In the year-to-date period, PJFAX achieves a 19.18% return, which is significantly lower than FBGRX's 34.83% return. Over the past 10 years, PJFAX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 7.71%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.63% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

PJFAX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current PJFAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJFAX and FBGRX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

PJFAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%.

The maximum PJFAX drawdown since its inception was -67.83%, which is greater than FBGRX's maximum drawdown of -57.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJFAX and FBGRX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX) has a higher volatility of 11.69% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) at 5.42%. This indicates that PJFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.