PJFAX vs. FBGRX
Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX).
PJFAX is managed by PGIM Investments. It was launched on Nov 2, 1995. FBGRX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 31, 1987.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PJFAX or FBGRX.
Key characteristics
PJFAX | FBGRX | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 29.27% | 37.67% |
1Y Return | 33.01% | 52.51% |
3Y Return (Ann) | -2.92% | 7.26% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 9.53% | 18.77% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 8.10% | 14.17% |
Sharpe Ratio | 1.62 | 2.64 |
Sortino Ratio | 2.13 | 3.39 |
Omega Ratio | 1.31 | 1.47 |
Calmar Ratio | 0.97 | 2.43 |
Martin Ratio | 8.01 | 12.93 |
Ulcer Index | 3.96% | 3.97% |
Daily Std Dev | 19.60% | 19.41% |
Max Drawdown | -67.83% | -57.42% |
Current Drawdown | -9.87% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between PJFAX and FBGRX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
PJFAX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, PJFAX achieves a 29.27% return, which is significantly lower than FBGRX's 37.67% return. Over the past 10 years, PJFAX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 8.10%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.17% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PJFAX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PJFAX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PJFAX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PJFAX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison
PJFAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.10%.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGIM Jennison Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | 5.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 0.09% | 0.22% | 5.07% | 6.08% | 7.80% |
Drawdowns
PJFAX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PJFAX drawdown since its inception was -67.83%, which is greater than FBGRX's maximum drawdown of -57.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJFAX and FBGRX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PJFAX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX) is 5.02%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a volatility of 5.39%. This indicates that PJFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.