PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PJFAX vs. FBGRX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


PJFAXFBGRX
YTD Return29.27%37.67%
1Y Return33.01%52.51%
3Y Return (Ann)-2.92%7.26%
5Y Return (Ann)9.53%18.77%
10Y Return (Ann)8.10%14.17%
Sharpe Ratio1.622.64
Sortino Ratio2.133.39
Omega Ratio1.311.47
Calmar Ratio0.972.43
Martin Ratio8.0112.93
Ulcer Index3.96%3.97%
Daily Std Dev19.60%19.41%
Max Drawdown-67.83%-57.42%
Current Drawdown-9.87%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between PJFAX and FBGRX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

PJFAX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, PJFAX achieves a 29.27% return, which is significantly lower than FBGRX's 37.67% return. Over the past 10 years, PJFAX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 8.10%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.17% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
15.45%
17.90%
PJFAX
FBGRX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PJFAX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PJFAX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.


PJFAX
PGIM Jennison Growth Fund
Expense ratio chart for PJFAX: current value at 0.97% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.97%
Expense ratio chart for FBGRX: current value at 0.79% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.79%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PJFAX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PJFAX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PJFAX, currently valued at 1.62, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.62
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PJFAX, currently valued at 2.13, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.13
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PJFAX, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.31
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PJFAX, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.97
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PJFAX, currently valued at 8.01, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.008.01
FBGRX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FBGRX, currently valued at 2.64, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.64
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FBGRX, currently valued at 3.39, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.39
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FBGRX, currently valued at 1.47, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.47
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FBGRX, currently valued at 2.43, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.002.43
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FBGRX, currently valued at 12.93, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0012.93

PJFAX vs. FBGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PJFAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is lower than the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJFAX and FBGRX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.62
2.64
PJFAX
FBGRX

Dividends

PJFAX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

PJFAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.10%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
PJFAX
PGIM Jennison Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
5.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.12%0.09%0.22%5.07%6.08%7.80%

Drawdowns

PJFAX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJFAX drawdown since its inception was -67.83%, which is greater than FBGRX's maximum drawdown of -57.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJFAX and FBGRX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-9.87%
0
PJFAX
FBGRX

Volatility

PJFAX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX) is 5.02%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a volatility of 5.39%. This indicates that PJFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.02%
5.39%
PJFAX
FBGRX