PortfoliosLab logo
PIRC.MI vs. ML.PA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between PIRC.MI and ML.PA is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.3

Performance

PIRC.MI vs. ML.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pirelli & C SPA (PIRC.MI) and Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions (ML.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.47%
23.88%
PIRC.MI
ML.PA

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PIRC.MI:

-0.25

ML.PA:

-0.45

Sortino Ratio

PIRC.MI:

-0.18

ML.PA:

-0.46

Omega Ratio

PIRC.MI:

0.98

ML.PA:

0.94

Calmar Ratio

PIRC.MI:

-0.23

ML.PA:

-0.40

Martin Ratio

PIRC.MI:

-0.63

ML.PA:

-0.79

Ulcer Index

PIRC.MI:

9.69%

ML.PA:

12.66%

Daily Std Dev

PIRC.MI:

24.39%

ML.PA:

22.40%

Max Drawdown

PIRC.MI:

-60.30%

ML.PA:

-80.97%

Current Drawdown

PIRC.MI:

-16.11%

ML.PA:

-18.22%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PIRC.MI:

€5.39B

ML.PA:

€22.38B

EPS

PIRC.MI:

€0.47

ML.PA:

€10.24

PE Ratio

PIRC.MI:

11.47

ML.PA:

3.06

PS Ratio

PIRC.MI:

0.80

ML.PA:

0.83

PB Ratio

PIRC.MI:

0.97

ML.PA:

1.19

Total Revenue (TTM)

PIRC.MI:

€3.49B

ML.PA:

€27.19B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PIRC.MI:

€2.37B

ML.PA:

€8.26B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIRC.MI achieves a -1.53% return, which is significantly lower than ML.PA's -1.32% return.


PIRC.MI

YTD

-1.53%

1M

-2.07%

6M

4.22%

1Y

-6.72%

5Y*

13.39%

10Y*

N/A

ML.PA

YTD

-1.32%

1M

-4.91%

6M

0.71%

1Y

-8.64%

5Y*

10.78%

10Y*

5.46%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PIRC.MI vs. ML.PA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIRC.MI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PIRC.MI is 3636
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PIRC.MI is 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PIRC.MI is 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PIRC.MI is 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PIRC.MI is 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PIRC.MI is 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

ML.PA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ML.PA is 2828
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ML.PA is 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ML.PA is 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ML.PA is 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ML.PA is 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ML.PA is 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PIRC.MI vs. ML.PA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pirelli & C SPA (PIRC.MI) and Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions (ML.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for PIRC.MI, currently valued at -0.01, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
PIRC.MI: -0.01
ML.PA: -0.17
The chart of Sortino ratio for PIRC.MI, currently valued at 0.16, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
PIRC.MI: 0.16
ML.PA: -0.07
The chart of Omega ratio for PIRC.MI, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
PIRC.MI: 1.02
ML.PA: 0.99
The chart of Calmar ratio for PIRC.MI, currently valued at -0.01, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
PIRC.MI: -0.01
ML.PA: -0.17
The chart of Martin ratio for PIRC.MI, currently valued at -0.04, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
PIRC.MI: -0.04
ML.PA: -0.31

The current PIRC.MI Sharpe Ratio is -0.25, which is higher than the ML.PA Sharpe Ratio of -0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIRC.MI and ML.PA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.01
-0.17
PIRC.MI
ML.PA

Dividends

PIRC.MI vs. ML.PA - Dividend Comparison

PIRC.MI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, less than ML.PA's 4.30% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PIRC.MI
Pirelli & C SPA
3.67%3.62%4.42%4.02%1.31%4.13%3.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ML.PA
Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions
4.30%4.25%3.85%4.33%1.60%1.91%3.39%4.09%2.72%2.70%2.84%3.32%

Drawdowns

PIRC.MI vs. ML.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIRC.MI drawdown since its inception was -60.30%, smaller than the maximum ML.PA drawdown of -80.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIRC.MI and ML.PA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-22.11%
-14.12%
PIRC.MI
ML.PA

Volatility

PIRC.MI vs. ML.PA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pirelli & C SPA (PIRC.MI) is 12.26%, while Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions (ML.PA) has a volatility of 13.02%. This indicates that PIRC.MI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ML.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
12.26%
13.02%
PIRC.MI
ML.PA

Financials

PIRC.MI vs. ML.PA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pirelli & C SPA and Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in EUR except per share items