PortfoliosLab logo
PIO vs. EBLU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between PIO and EBLU is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

PIO vs. EBLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Global Water ETF (PIO) and Ecofin Global Water ESG Fund (EBLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PIO:

0.30

EBLU:

0.68

Sortino Ratio

PIO:

0.42

EBLU:

1.04

Omega Ratio

PIO:

1.05

EBLU:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

PIO:

0.21

EBLU:

0.72

Martin Ratio

PIO:

0.73

EBLU:

2.40

Ulcer Index

PIO:

4.95%

EBLU:

4.63%

Daily Std Dev

PIO:

18.11%

EBLU:

17.72%

Max Drawdown

PIO:

-64.91%

EBLU:

-37.58%

Current Drawdown

PIO:

-1.17%

EBLU:

-0.34%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PIO having a 10.26% return and EBLU slightly lower at 10.22%.


PIO

YTD

10.26%

1M

3.46%

6M

3.63%

1Y

4.00%

3Y*

9.15%

5Y*

9.54%

10Y*

7.00%

EBLU

YTD

10.22%

1M

4.54%

6M

3.51%

1Y

10.72%

3Y*

12.20%

5Y*

12.64%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Invesco Global Water ETF

Ecofin Global Water ESG Fund

PIO vs. EBLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than EBLU's 0.40% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PIO vs. EBLU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PIO is 2626
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PIO is 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PIO is 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PIO is 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PIO is 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PIO is 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

EBLU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EBLU is 6060
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EBLU is 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EBLU is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EBLU is 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EBLU is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EBLU is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PIO vs. EBLU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Water ETF (PIO) and Ecofin Global Water ESG Fund (EBLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PIO Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the EBLU Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIO and EBLU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

PIO vs. EBLU - Dividend Comparison

PIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than EBLU's 1.21% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PIO
Invesco Global Water ETF
0.82%0.78%0.84%1.02%1.19%0.88%1.20%2.00%1.00%1.45%1.63%1.42%
EBLU
Ecofin Global Water ESG Fund
1.21%1.34%1.46%1.64%1.55%1.42%1.58%1.35%0.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PIO vs. EBLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIO drawdown since its inception was -64.91%, which is greater than EBLU's maximum drawdown of -37.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIO and EBLU.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

PIO vs. EBLU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Global Water ETF (PIO) is 3.83%, while Ecofin Global Water ESG Fund (EBLU) has a volatility of 4.69%. This indicates that PIO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EBLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...