PII vs. AMZA
PII (Polaris Industries Inc.) is a stock, while AMZA (InfraCap MLP ETF) is MLPs fund actively managed by Virtus Investment Partners. Over the past 10 years, PII returned 0.86%/yr vs 4.86%/yr for AMZA. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PII vs. AMZA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PII achieves a 10.30% return, which is significantly lower than AMZA's 22.22% return. Over the past 10 years, PII has underperformed AMZA with an annualized return of 0.86%, while AMZA has yielded a comparatively higher 4.86% annualized return.
PII
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 10.18%
- YTD
- 10.30%
- 6M
- 4.61%
- 1Y
- 75.63%
- 3Y*
- -12.69%
- 5Y*
- -8.47%
- 10Y*
- 0.86%
AMZA
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- YTD
- 22.22%
- 6M
- 20.41%
- 1Y
- 17.55%
- 3Y*
- 22.02%
- 5Y*
- 19.41%
- 10Y*
- 4.86%
PII vs. AMZA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PII Polaris Industries Inc. | 10.30% | 15.90% | -37.19% | -3.79% | -6.01% | 17.75% | -3.78% | 36.37% | -36.76% | 54.19% |
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF | 22.22% | 0.17% | 30.90% | 23.35% | 33.20% | 51.22% | -49.25% | 6.27% | -26.78% | -6.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between PII and AMZA is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2014 | 0.33 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PII and AMZA has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PII vs. AMZA — Risk / Return Rank
PII
AMZA
PII vs. AMZA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polaris Industries Inc. (PII) and InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PII | AMZA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.17 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | 1.45 | +0.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.47 | 3.65 | +2.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PII | AMZA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 1.00 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.20 | 0.76 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 | 0.13 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | -0.02 | +0.43 |
Drawdowns
PII vs. AMZA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PII drawdown since its inception was -77.57%, smaller than the maximum AMZA drawdown of -91.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PII and AMZA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PII | AMZA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.57% | -91.46% | +13.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.21% | -12.16% | -22.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.23% | -18.56% | -56.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.23% | -25.15% | -50.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.62% | -86.84% | +11.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.66% | -10.19% | -34.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.73% | -45.02% | +25.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.72% | 4.82% | +6.90% |
Volatility
PII vs. AMZA - Volatility Comparison
Polaris Industries Inc. (PII) has a higher volatility of 13.54% compared to InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) at 5.80%. This indicates that PII's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMZA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PII | AMZA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.54% | 5.80% | +7.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.61% | 13.40% | +24.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.09% | 17.72% | +38.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.68% | 25.84% | +16.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.77% | 37.25% | +5.52% |
Dividends
PII vs. AMZA - Dividend Comparison
PII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, less than AMZA's 8.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF | 8.02% | 8.81% | 7.29% | 9.40% | 7.65% | 10.24% | 22.13% | 19.47% | 34.46% | 24.16% | 18.36% | 18.21% |
PII Polaris Industries Inc. | 3.95% | 4.24% | 4.58% | 2.74% | 2.53% | 2.29% | 2.60% | 2.40% | 3.13% | 1.87% | 2.67% | 2.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PII and AMZA have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PII has higher volatility (13.54%) compared to AMZA (5.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PII dropped -77.57% vs AMZA's -91.46%.
PII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PII and AMZA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer