PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PI vs. ONTO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PI vs. ONTO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Impinj, Inc. (PI) and Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PI achieves a -24.38% return, which is significantly lower than ONTO's 120.37% return.


PI

1D
2.24%
1M
-12.13%
YTD
-24.38%
6M
-26.18%
1Y
27.05%
3Y*
14.79%
5Y*
20.89%
10Y*

ONTO

1D
4.23%
1M
32.65%
YTD
120.37%
6M
118.42%
1Y
263.05%
3Y*
48.86%
5Y*
38.00%
10Y*
32.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PI vs. ONTO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PI
Impinj, Inc.
-24.38%19.79%61.35%-17.54%23.09%111.85%61.91%77.73%-35.42%-36.25%
ONTO
Onto Innovation Inc.
120.37%-5.29%9.01%124.56%-32.74%112.89%30.13%33.70%9.67%-0.56%

Correlation

The correlation between PI and ONTO is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2016

0.43

The correlation between PI and ONTO shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.49 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PI:

$3.99B

ONTO:

$17.39B

EPS

PI:

-$0.93

ONTO:

$2.15

PS Ratio

PI:

10.88

ONTO:

16.68

PB Ratio

PI:

19.55

ONTO:

8.16

Total Revenue (TTM)

PI:

$361.05M

ONTO:

$1.03B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PI:

$188.92M

ONTO:

$502.93M

EBITDA (TTM)

PI:

-$4.74M

ONTO:

$177.93M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PI vs. ONTO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PI
PI Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
PI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
PI Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
PI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
PI Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

ONTO
ONTO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ONTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONTO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
ONTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONTO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PI vs. ONTO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Impinj, Inc. (PI) and Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PIONTODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.51

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.44

13.09

-12.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.78

35.58

-34.80

PI vs. ONTO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PI Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the ONTO Sharpe Ratio of 4.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PI and ONTO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PI vs. ONTO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PI drawdown since its inception was -81.35%, smaller than the maximum ONTO drawdown of -98.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PI and ONTO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PIONTODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.35%

-98.56%

+17.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-62.24%

-20.24%

-42.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-73.79%

-62.82%

-10.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.79%

-62.82%

-10.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.60%

0.00%

-45.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.72%

-54.66%

+17.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.84%

7.43%

+27.41%

Volatility

PI vs. ONTO - Volatility Comparison

Impinj, Inc. (PI) and Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) have volatilities of 22.22% and 21.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PIONTODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.22%

21.93%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.66%

44.23%

+13.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

75.87%

57.96%

+17.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

69.79%

55.89%

+13.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.88%

51.48%

+21.40%

Dividends

PI vs. ONTO - Dividend Comparison

Neither PI nor ONTO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

PI vs. ONTO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Impinj, Inc. and Onto Innovation Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


50.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M20222023202420252026
74.25M
291.95M
(PI) Total Revenue
(ONTO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PI vs. ONTO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Impinj, Inc. and Onto Innovation Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

46.0%48.0%50.0%52.0%54.0%56.0%58.0%20222023202420252026
49.1%
50.1%
Portfolio components
PI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Impinj, Inc. reported a gross profit of 36.46M and revenue of 74.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.1%.

ONTO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Onto Innovation Inc. reported a gross profit of 146.39M and revenue of 291.95M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.1%.

PI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Impinj, Inc. reported an operating income of -15.17M and revenue of 74.25M, resulting in an operating margin of -20.4%.

ONTO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Onto Innovation Inc. reported an operating income of 33.51M and revenue of 291.95M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.

PI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Impinj, Inc. reported a net income of -25.26M and revenue of 74.25M, resulting in a net margin of -34.0%.

ONTO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Onto Innovation Inc. reported a net income of 33.75M and revenue of 291.95M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PI and ONTO have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PI has higher volatility (22.22%) compared to ONTO (21.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PI dropped -81.35% vs ONTO's -98.56%.

ONTO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.58 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PI and ONTO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer