PortfoliosLab logo
PI vs. CSWI
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between PI and CSWI is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

PI vs. CSWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Impinj, Inc. (PI) and CSW Industrials, Inc. (CSWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

PI:

28.60%

CSWI:

33.05%

Max Drawdown

PI:

-1.98%

CSWI:

-3.62%

Current Drawdown

PI:

0.00%

CSWI:

-2.10%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PI:

$2.90B

CSWI:

$5.22B

EPS

PI:

-$0.06

CSWI:

$8.34

PEG Ratio

PI:

0.00

CSWI:

2.84

PS Ratio

PI:

7.97

CSWI:

6.08

PB Ratio

PI:

17.63

CSWI:

5.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

PI:

$363.54M

CSWI:

$647.75M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PI:

$187.49M

CSWI:

$291.43M

EBITDA (TTM)

PI:

$14.54M

CSWI:

$167.09M

Returns By Period


PI

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

CSWI

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PI vs. CSWI — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PI is 2121
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PI is 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PI is 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PI is 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PI is 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PI is 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

CSWI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CSWI is 7272
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CSWI is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CSWI is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CSWI is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CSWI is 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CSWI is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PI vs. CSWI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Impinj, Inc. (PI) and CSW Industrials, Inc. (CSWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

PI vs. CSWI - Dividend Comparison

PI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CSWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%.


TTM202420232022202120202019
PI
Impinj, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CSWI
CSW Industrials, Inc.
0.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PI vs. CSWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PI drawdown since its inception was -1.98%, smaller than the maximum CSWI drawdown of -3.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PI and CSWI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

PI vs. CSWI - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...

Financials

PI vs. CSWI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Impinj, Inc. and CSW Industrials, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


50.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20212022202320242025
74.28M
193.65M
(PI) Total Revenue
(CSWI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PI vs. CSWI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Impinj, Inc. and CSW Industrials, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%20212022202320242025
49.4%
41.4%
(PI) Gross Margin
(CSWI) Gross Margin
PI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Impinj, Inc. reported a gross profit of 36.68M and revenue of 74.28M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.4%.

CSWI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CSW Industrials, Inc. reported a gross profit of 80.11M and revenue of 193.65M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.4%.

PI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Impinj, Inc. reported an operating income of -9.57M and revenue of 74.28M, resulting in an operating margin of -12.9%.

CSWI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CSW Industrials, Inc. reported an operating income of 29.60M and revenue of 193.65M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.3%.

PI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Impinj, Inc. reported a net income of -8.45M and revenue of 74.28M, resulting in a net margin of -11.4%.

CSWI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CSW Industrials, Inc. reported a net income of 26.95M and revenue of 193.65M, resulting in a net margin of 13.9%.