PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PHYS vs. XAU.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


PHYSXAU.TO
YTD Return24.11%6.66%
1Y Return28.54%2.33%
3Y Return (Ann)10.44%-13.05%
5Y Return (Ann)10.95%-3.70%
10Y Return (Ann)7.23%191.19%
Sharpe Ratio2.010.03
Sortino Ratio2.620.32
Omega Ratio1.351.04
Calmar Ratio3.390.01
Martin Ratio12.210.13
Ulcer Index2.42%9.56%
Daily Std Dev14.71%35.56%
Max Drawdown-48.16%-83.45%
Current Drawdown-8.73%-78.62%

Fundamentals


PHYSXAU.TO
Market Cap$8.17BCA$111.20M
EPS$0.10-CA$1.37
Total Revenue (TTM)$66.11MCA$65.38M
Gross Profit (TTM)$47.47MCA$20.53M
EBITDA (TTM)$1.47BCA$17.50M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between PHYS and XAU.TO is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

PHYS vs. XAU.TO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, PHYS achieves a 24.11% return, which is significantly higher than XAU.TO's 6.66% return. Over the past 10 years, PHYS has underperformed XAU.TO with an annualized return of 7.23%, while XAU.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 191.19% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
7.10%
4.30%
PHYS
XAU.TO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PHYS vs. XAU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) and Goldmoney Inc. (XAU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PHYS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PHYS, currently valued at 1.89, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.89
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PHYS, currently valued at 2.49, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.49
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PHYS, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.33
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PHYS, currently valued at 3.19, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.19
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PHYS, currently valued at 11.31, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0011.31
XAU.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XAU.TO, currently valued at 0.08, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.08
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for XAU.TO, currently valued at 0.39, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.39
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for XAU.TO, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.05
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for XAU.TO, currently valued at 0.03, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.03
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for XAU.TO, currently valued at 0.29, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.29

PHYS vs. XAU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHYS Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the XAU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHYS and XAU.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.89
0.08
PHYS
XAU.TO

Dividends

PHYS vs. XAU.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither PHYS nor XAU.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019
PHYS
Sprott Physical Gold Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XAU.TO
Goldmoney Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2,139,037.43%

Drawdowns

PHYS vs. XAU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHYS drawdown since its inception was -48.16%, smaller than the maximum XAU.TO drawdown of -83.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYS and XAU.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-8.73%
-80.37%
PHYS
XAU.TO

Volatility

PHYS vs. XAU.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) is 5.67%, while Goldmoney Inc. (XAU.TO) has a volatility of 10.93%. This indicates that PHYS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XAU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.67%
10.93%
PHYS
XAU.TO

Financials

PHYS vs. XAU.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sprott Physical Gold Trust and Goldmoney Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Please note, different currencies. PHYS values in USD, XAU.TO values in CAD