PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PHYS vs. GC=F
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


PHYSGC=F
YTD Return26.43%27.17%
1Y Return33.03%35.71%
3Y Return (Ann)11.15%10.71%
5Y Return (Ann)10.95%10.99%
10Y Return (Ann)7.43%7.30%
Sharpe Ratio2.162.21
Sortino Ratio2.802.83
Omega Ratio1.371.41
Calmar Ratio3.584.92
Martin Ratio13.7812.77
Ulcer Index2.30%2.45%
Daily Std Dev14.68%14.16%
Max Drawdown-48.16%-44.36%
Current Drawdown-7.02%-5.94%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between PHYS and GC=F is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

PHYS vs. GC=F - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PHYS having a 26.43% return and GC=F slightly higher at 27.17%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PHYS having a 7.43% annualized return and GC=F not far behind at 7.30%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
10.29%
11.45%
PHYS
GC=F

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PHYS vs. GC=F - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) and Gold (GC=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PHYS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PHYS, currently valued at 2.06, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.06
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PHYS, currently valued at 2.70, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.70
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PHYS, currently valued at 1.38, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.38
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PHYS, currently valued at 3.89, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.89
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PHYS, currently valued at 12.34, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0012.34
GC=F
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 2.21, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.21
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 2.83, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.83
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.41
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 4.92, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.004.92
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 12.77, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0012.77

PHYS vs. GC=F - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHYS Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the GC=F Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHYS and GC=F, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.06
2.21
PHYS
GC=F

Drawdowns

PHYS vs. GC=F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHYS drawdown since its inception was -48.16%, which is greater than GC=F's maximum drawdown of -44.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYS and GC=F. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-7.02%
-5.94%
PHYS
GC=F

Volatility

PHYS vs. GC=F - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) has a higher volatility of 5.55% compared to Gold (GC=F) at 5.19%. This indicates that PHYS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GC=F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.50%3.00%3.50%4.00%4.50%5.00%5.50%6.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.55%
5.19%
PHYS
GC=F