PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PHYS vs. GC=F
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between PHYS and GC=F is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

PHYS vs. GC=F - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) and Gold (GC=F). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
16.24%
18.02%
PHYS
GC=F

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PHYS:

3.04

GC=F:

2.47

Sortino Ratio

PHYS:

3.71

GC=F:

3.04

Omega Ratio

PHYS:

1.51

GC=F:

1.44

Calmar Ratio

PHYS:

5.05

GC=F:

4.65

Martin Ratio

PHYS:

14.29

GC=F:

11.69

Ulcer Index

PHYS:

3.27%

GC=F:

3.18%

Daily Std Dev

PHYS:

15.38%

GC=F:

14.80%

Max Drawdown

PHYS:

-48.16%

GC=F:

-44.36%

Current Drawdown

PHYS:

0.00%

GC=F:

0.00%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PHYS having a 12.66% return and GC=F slightly lower at 12.59%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PHYS having a 8.56% annualized return and GC=F not far behind at 8.27%.


PHYS

YTD

12.66%

1M

8.72%

6M

16.24%

1Y

45.73%

5Y*

11.32%

10Y*

8.56%

GC=F

YTD

12.59%

1M

8.42%

6M

18.01%

1Y

46.00%

5Y*

11.00%

10Y*

8.27%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PHYS vs. GC=F — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHYS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PHYS is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PHYS is 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PHYS is 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PHYS is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PHYS is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PHYS is 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

GC=F
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GC=F is 100100
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GC=F is 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GC=F is 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GC=F is 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GC=F is 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GC=F is 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PHYS vs. GC=F - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) and Gold (GC=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PHYS, currently valued at 2.27, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.002.272.47
The chart of Sortino ratio for PHYS, currently valued at 2.86, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.863.04
The chart of Omega ratio for PHYS, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.411.44
The chart of Calmar ratio for PHYS, currently valued at 3.66, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.664.65
The chart of Martin ratio for PHYS, currently valued at 9.71, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.009.7111.69
PHYS
GC=F

The current PHYS Sharpe Ratio is 3.04, which is comparable to the GC=F Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHYS and GC=F, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.802.002.202.402.602.80SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.27
2.47
PHYS
GC=F

Drawdowns

PHYS vs. GC=F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHYS drawdown since its inception was -48.16%, which is greater than GC=F's maximum drawdown of -44.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYS and GC=F. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February00
PHYS
GC=F

Volatility

PHYS vs. GC=F - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) is 3.51%, while Gold (GC=F) has a volatility of 4.11%. This indicates that PHYS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GC=F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
3.51%
4.11%
PHYS
GC=F
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab