PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PHYS.TO vs. SETM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between PHYS.TO and SETM is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

PHYS.TO vs. SETM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS.TO) and Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
36.37%
-22.12%
PHYS.TO
SETM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PHYS.TO:

2.73

SETM:

-0.28

Sortino Ratio

PHYS.TO:

3.39

SETM:

-0.18

Omega Ratio

PHYS.TO:

1.48

SETM:

0.98

Calmar Ratio

PHYS.TO:

4.58

SETM:

-0.29

Martin Ratio

PHYS.TO:

14.40

SETM:

-0.63

Ulcer Index

PHYS.TO:

2.64%

SETM:

14.43%

Daily Std Dev

PHYS.TO:

13.93%

SETM:

32.88%

Max Drawdown

PHYS.TO:

-27.08%

SETM:

-30.97%

Current Drawdown

PHYS.TO:

-3.62%

SETM:

-25.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHYS.TO achieves a 37.65% return, which is significantly higher than SETM's -12.47% return.


PHYS.TO

YTD

37.65%

1M

1.65%

6M

17.48%

1Y

38.04%

5Y*

13.33%

10Y*

N/A

SETM

YTD

-12.47%

1M

-13.55%

6M

-10.30%

1Y

-12.65%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PHYS.TO vs. SETM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS.TO) and Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PHYS.TO, currently valued at 1.70, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.70-0.41
The chart of Sortino ratio for PHYS.TO, currently valued at 2.19, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.19-0.40
The chart of Omega ratio for PHYS.TO, currently valued at 1.30, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.300.95
The chart of Calmar ratio for PHYS.TO, currently valued at 2.81, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.81-0.44
The chart of Martin ratio for PHYS.TO, currently valued at 8.71, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.008.71-0.94
PHYS.TO
SETM

The current PHYS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is higher than the SETM Sharpe Ratio of -0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHYS.TO and SETM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.70
-0.41
PHYS.TO
SETM

Dividends

PHYS.TO vs. SETM - Dividend Comparison

PHYS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SETM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%.


TTM2023
PHYS.TO
Sprott Physical Gold Trust
0.00%0.00%
SETM
Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF
2.05%2.48%

Drawdowns

PHYS.TO vs. SETM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHYS.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.08%, smaller than the maximum SETM drawdown of -30.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYS.TO and SETM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-6.78%
-25.42%
PHYS.TO
SETM

Volatility

PHYS.TO vs. SETM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS.TO) is 5.44%, while Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that PHYS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SETM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
5.44%
7.35%
PHYS.TO
SETM
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab