PHO vs. XSD
PHO (Invesco Water Resources ETF) and XSD (SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PHO is a Water Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ OMX US Water Index, while XSD is a Semiconductors fund tracking the S&P Semiconductor Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PHO returned 11.75%/yr vs 27.41%/yr for XSD. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PHO charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XSD.
Performance
PHO vs. XSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHO achieves a -0.34% return, which is significantly lower than XSD's 57.73% return. Over the past 10 years, PHO has underperformed XSD with an annualized return of 11.75%, while XSD has yielded a comparatively higher 27.41% annualized return.
PHO
- 1D
- 2.37%
- 1M
- 3.28%
- 6M
- -5.62%
- YTD
- -0.34%
- 1Y
- 0.78%
- 3Y*
- 7.67%
- 5Y*
- 5.63%
- 10Y*
- 11.75%
XSD
- 1D
- -5.63%
- 1M
- -14.92%
- 6M
- 44.09%
- YTD
- 57.73%
- 1Y
- 91.59%
- 3Y*
- 30.16%
- 5Y*
- 23.82%
- 10Y*
- 27.41%
PHO vs. XSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF | -0.34% | 7.62% | 8.59% | 18.85% | -14.86% | 31.28% | 20.83% | 37.57% | -6.40% | 23.55% |
XSD SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF | 57.73% | 29.85% | 10.75% | 34.87% | -30.92% | 42.54% | 61.95% | 64.66% | -6.35% | 25.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between PHO and XSD is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2006 | 0.64 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PHO and XSD has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PHO vs. XSD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PHO
XSD
Industrials
Utilities
-
Technology
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
PHO
XSD
Utilities
PHO
XSD
-
Technology
PHO
XSD
Healthcare
PHO
XSD
-
Basic Materials
PHO
XSD
-
Financial Services
PHO
XSD
-
Communication Services
PHO
-
XSD
-
Consumer Cyclical
PHO
-
XSD
-
Consumer Defensive
PHO
-
XSD
-
Energy
PHO
-
XSD
Real Estate
PHO
-
XSD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PHO vs. XSD — Risk / Return Rank
PHO
XSD
PHO vs. XSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) and SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PHO | XSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.33 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.06 | 4.19 | -4.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.13 | 13.90 | -13.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PHO vs. XSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHO drawdown since its inception was -55.62%, smaller than the maximum XSD drawdown of -64.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHO and XSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHO | XSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.62% | -64.56% | +8.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.78% | -21.97% | +8.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.19% | -41.25% | +22.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.60% | -42.27% | +13.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.92% | -42.27% | +7.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.84% | -21.97% | +16.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.17% | -13.72% | +3.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.06% | 6.61% | -0.55% |
Volatility
PHO vs. XSD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) is 5.12%, while SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD) has a volatility of 20.07%. This indicates that PHO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PHO | XSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.12% | 20.07% | -14.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.79% | 36.94% | -25.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.52% | 43.56% | -28.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.47% | 39.77% | -21.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.46% | 35.71% | -16.25% |
PHO vs. XSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
PHO has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than XSD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
PHO vs. XSD - Dividend Comparison
PHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, more than XSD's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF | 0.58% | 0.54% | 0.45% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.43% | 0.46% | 0.34% | 0.47% | 0.75% |
XSD SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF | 0.15% | 0.26% | 0.20% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.10% | 0.26% | 0.51% | 1.16% | 0.59% | 0.64% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PHO and XSD have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XSD has higher volatility (20.07%) compared to PHO (5.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHO dropped -55.62% vs XSD's -64.56%.
On 10-year performance, XSD leads with 27.41% vs 11.75% for PHO. On fees, XSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, PHO has been the lower-risk option at 5.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XSD has performed better with a 27.41% return vs 11.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PHO.
PHO has the higher dividend yield at 0.58%, compared with 0.15% for XSD.
PHO is categorized as Water Equities, while XSD is Semiconductors. PHO tracks NASDAQ OMX US Water Index, while XSD tracks S&P Semiconductor Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PHO and 0.35% for XSD.
XSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PHO and XSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer