PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PHO vs. MOO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


PHOMOO
YTD Return4.41%-7.10%
1Y Return21.20%-16.92%
3Y Return (Ann)7.54%-6.04%
5Y Return (Ann)13.69%3.86%
10Y Return (Ann)9.73%4.78%
Sharpe Ratio1.48-1.07
Daily Std Dev14.70%15.24%
Max Drawdown-55.62%-69.53%
Current Drawdown-4.64%-31.25%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between PHO and MOO is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

PHO vs. MOO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, PHO achieves a 4.41% return, which is significantly higher than MOO's -7.10% return. Over the past 10 years, PHO has outperformed MOO with an annualized return of 9.73%, while MOO has yielded a comparatively lower 4.78% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
22.93%
-4.05%
PHO
MOO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Invesco Water Resources ETF

VanEck Vectors Agribusiness ETF

PHO vs. MOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than MOO's 0.54% expense ratio.

PHO
Invesco Water Resources ETF
0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%
0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.54%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PHO vs. MOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) and VanEck Vectors Agribusiness ETF (MOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PHO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PHO, currently valued at 1.48, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.001.48
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PHO, currently valued at 2.12, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.002.12
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PHO, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.501.26
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PHO, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.25
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PHO, currently valued at 4.69, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.004.69
MOO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MOO, currently valued at -1.07, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.00-1.07
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MOO, currently valued at -1.51, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00-1.51
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MOO, currently valued at 0.84, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.500.84
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MOO, currently valued at -0.51, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00-0.51
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MOO, currently valued at -1.42, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00-1.42

PHO vs. MOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHO Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is higher than the MOO Sharpe Ratio of -1.07. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of PHO and MOO.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.00NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
1.48
-1.07
PHO
MOO

Dividends

PHO vs. MOO - Dividend Comparison

PHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than MOO's 3.16% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
PHO
Invesco Water Resources ETF
0.54%0.59%0.49%0.20%0.39%0.43%0.46%0.34%0.47%0.75%0.59%0.49%
MOO
VanEck Vectors Agribusiness ETF
3.16%2.93%2.15%1.17%1.10%1.32%1.69%1.44%2.14%2.89%3.21%1.91%

Drawdowns

PHO vs. MOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHO drawdown since its inception was -55.62%, smaller than the maximum MOO drawdown of -69.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHO and MOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-4.64%
-31.25%
PHO
MOO

Volatility

PHO vs. MOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) is 3.98%, while VanEck Vectors Agribusiness ETF (MOO) has a volatility of 4.53%. This indicates that PHO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
3.98%
4.53%
PHO
MOO